[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] (2/2) reverse mappings for current 2.5.23 VM

To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (2/2) reverse mappings for current 2.5.23 VM
From: Craig Kulesa <ckulesa@as.arizona.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 13:25:27 -0700 (MST)
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <E17KjXH-0000vN-00@starship>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>

On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> On Wednesday 19 June 2002 13:21, Craig Kulesa wrote:
> > 2.5.22 vanilla:
>       ^^--- is this a typo?

Good eye, but no.  I was indeed comparing 2.5.22 to the 2.5.23 rmap 
patches.  I performed the same test on 2.5.23 later and its behavior is 
similar. 

-Craig

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] (2/2) reverse mappings for current 2.5.23 VM
  - From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] (1/2) reverse mapping VM for 2.5.23 (rmap-13b)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] (1/2) reverse mapping VM for 2.5.23 (rmap-13b)
Prev by thread: Re: [PATCH] (2/2) reverse mappings for current 2.5.23 VM
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] (2/2) reverse mappings for current 2.5.23 VM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread