[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?

On Wed, 8 May 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 May 2002 16:43, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 May 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> >
> > > To make this concrete, what would copy_page_range look like, using this
> > > mechanism?
> >
> > Or maybe copy_page_range should be behind this mechanism and
> > modify the data structures directly ?
>
> It already modifies the data structures directly.  You're proposing that
> copy_page_range should be per_arch?

No. I'm not proposing that data structures should be different
per arch.

All I'm interested in is separating parts of the VM from each
other.

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/