[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why not rmap, anyway?

To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 22:08:29 -0700
CC: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,Christian Smith <csmith@micromuse.com>,Joseph A Knapka <jknapka@earthlink.net>,"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205071625570.1579-100000@erol> <E175Avp-0000Tm-00@starship> <20020507195007.GW15756@holomorphy.com> <E175Dy8-0000U6-00@starship> <20020508000857.GA15756@holomorphy.com>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> 
> zap_page_range() has ridiculous latencies.

prefetch in zap_pte_range() would help?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

References:
- Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
  - From: Christian Smith <csmith@micromuse.com>
- Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
  - From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
- Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
  - From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
- Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
  - From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
- Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
  - From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
Next by Date: Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
Prev by thread: Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
Next by thread: Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?

Re: Why not rmap, anyway?