Re: [PATCH] updated version of radix-tree pagecache

[William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>]

Christoph Hellwig schrieb:
>> [please Cc velco@fadata.bg and lkml on reply]
>> 
>> I've just uploaded an updated version of Momchil Velikov's patch for a
>> scalable pagecache using radix trees.  The patch can be found at:
>> 
>> It contains a number of fixed and improvements by Momchil and me.

On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:05:08AM +0100, Peter W?chtler wrote:
> Can you sum up the advantages of this implementation?
> I think it scales better on "big systems" where otherwise you end up
> with many pages on the same hash?
> 
> Is it beneficial for small systems? (I think not)

I speculate this would be good for small systems as well as it reduces
the size of struct page by 2*sizeof(unsigned long) bytes, allowing more
incremental allocation of pagecache metadata. I haven't tried it on my
smaller systems yet (due to lack of disk space and needing to build the
cross-toolchains), though I'm now curious as to its exact behavior there.

Has anyone tried to do accounting on the radix tree metadata overhead yet?

Cheers,
Bill
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/