Mail Index

• Thread Index

• runtimeimage of kernel module
  • From: Anumula Venkat <anumulavenkat@yahoo.com>
• Re: runtimeimage of kernel module
  • From: Joseph A Knapka <jknapka@earthlink.net>
• [PATCH] VM system in 2.4.16 doesn't try hard enough for user memory...
  • From: "S. Parker" <linux@sparker.net>
• Re: [PATCH] VM system in 2.4.16 doesn't try hard enough for user memory...
  • From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
• shmfs/tmpfs/vm-fs
  • From: der erste Schuettler <lothar.maerkle@gmx.de>
• [steiner@sgi.com: Re: TLB flushing in 2.4.14]
  • From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
• Re: shmfs/tmpfs/vm-fs
  • From: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>
• Re: shmfs/tmpfs/vm-fs
  • From: der erste Schuettler <lothar.maerkle@gmx.de>
• Re: shmfs/tmpfs/vm-fs
  • From: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>
• Re: [PATCH] VM system in 2.4.16 doesn't try hard enough for user memory...
  • From: "S. Parker" <linux@sparker.net>
• Re: shmfs/tmpfs/vm-fs
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
• Re: shmfs/tmpfs/vm-fs
  • From: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>
• ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode?
  • From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
• Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode?
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
• Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode?
  • From: Juan Piernas Canovas <piernas@ditec.um.es>
• Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode?
  • From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
• how has set_pgdir been replaced in 2.4.x
  • From: Martin Maletinsky <maletinsky@scs.ch>
• Re: how has set_pgdir been replaced in 2.4.x
  • From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
• RE: how has set_pgdir been replaced in 2.4.x
  • From: "Martin Frey" <frey@scs.ch>
• Re: how has set_pgdir been replaced in 2.4.x
  • From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
• Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode?
  • From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
• Allocation of kernel memory >128K
  • From: "Amit S. Jain" <amitjain@tifr.res.in>
• Re: Allocation of kernel memory >128K
  • From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: Allocation of kernel memory >128K
  • From: Mark_H_Johnson@Raytheon.com
• Re: Allocation of kernel memory >128K
  • From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
• Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode?
  • From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
• Re: Allocation of kernel memory >128K
  • From: "Amit S. Jain" <amitjain@tifr.res.in>
• Thread specific data
  • From: Anumula Venkat <anumulavenkat@yahoo.com>
• linux gui faster than windows?
  • From: lorenzo mitchell <unixlr@yahoo.com>
• Re: Thread specific data
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>
• VM questions
  • From: V.Dormeyer@t-online.de (Volker Dormeyer)
• Stealing memory pages.
  • From: "amey d inamdar" <iamey@rediffmail.com>
• Re: Stealing memory pages.
  • From: Ravi K <kravi26@yahoo.com>
• [PATCH *] 2.4.16-rmap-6
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
• Re: Allocation of kernel memory >128K
  • From: Vladimir Dergachev <volodya@mindspring.com>
• [RFC] Concept: Active/busy "reverse" mapping
  • From: Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@norran.net>
• Re: [RFC] Concept: Active/busy "reverse" mapping
  • From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
• test message
  • From: <bcrl+test@redhat.com>
• [PATCH *] reverse mapping VM 7
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
• Re: [RFC] Concept: Active/busy "reverse" mapping
  • From: Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@norran.net>
• Do You Want to Save Money on Toner Cartridges this December?
  • From: <felipodelacasa@latinmail.com>
• THE money-maker letter!
  • From: Matthew B <MJB10001@msn.com>
• few doubts on VMM
  • From: "Vishwanath K" <vishwanath@inablers.net>
• [PATCH *] rmap based VM version 8
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
• few doubts in mm
  • From: Vishwanath <vishwanath@inablers.net>
• Re: few doubts in mm
  • From: Ravi K <kravi26@yahoo.com>
• Allocation of kernel memory >128K
  • From: "Amit S. Jain" <amitjain@tifr.res.in>
• additional bit in task & page struct
  • From: "amey d inamdar" <iamey@rediffmail.com>
• [PATCH *] 2.4.17 rmap based VM #9
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
• Re: [PATCH *] 2.4.17 rmap based VM #9
  • From: safemode <safemode@speakeasy.net>
• Re: [PATCH *] 2.4.17 rmap based VM #9
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>