[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: recursive lock-enter-deadlock

To: R.Oehler@GDImbH.com
Subject: Re: recursive lock-enter-deadlock
From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:56:31 +0000
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011121111913.R.Oehler@GDImbH.com>; from R.Oehler@GDImbH.com on Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:19:13AM +0100
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <XFMail.20011121111913.R.Oehler@GDImbH.com>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:19:13AM +0100, R.Oehler@GDImbH.com wrote:
> A short question (I don't have a recent 2.4.x at hand, currently):
> 
> Is this recursive lock-enter-deadlock (2.4.0) fixed in newer kernels?

Yes.  Seriously, 2.4.0 is so old and so full of bugs like this that
it's really not worth spending any effort looking for problems like
that in it.

Cheers,
 Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: recursive lock-enter-deadlock
  - From: R.Oehler@GDImbH.com

References:
- recursive lock-enter-deadlock
  - From: R.Oehler@GDImbH.com

Prev by Date: recursive lock-enter-deadlock
Next by Date: Re: recursive lock-enter-deadlock
Prev by thread: recursive lock-enter-deadlock
Next by thread: Re: recursive lock-enter-deadlock
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread