[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [parisc-linux] Re: parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:04:54 +0000
Cc: grundler@puffin.external.hp.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <20011116.065243.134136673.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 06:52:43AM -0800
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <200111160730.AAA18774@puffin.external.hp.com> <20011116.065243.134136673.davem@redhat.com>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 06:52:43AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> No, you must have page+offset because in the future the
> "address" field of scatterlist is going to disappear
> and _ONLY_ page+offset will be used.

but _WHY_ in 2.4?  this is ridiculous for something which is alleged to
be a stable kernel.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [parisc-linux] Re: parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset
  - From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>

References:
- parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset
  - From: Grant Grundler <grundler@puffin.external.hp.com>
- Re: parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset
  - From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>

Prev by Date: Re: parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset
Next by Date: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset
Prev by thread: Re: parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset
Next by thread: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread