[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[02]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac

To: jlmales@softhome.net
Subject: Re: Re[02]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Date: 12 Oct 2001 00:41:19 -0400
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, linux-mm@kvack.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3BC63A77.19202.29B1FD0@localhost>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-www-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <3BC63A77.19202.29B1FD0@localhost>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

On Fri, 2001-10-12 at 01:33, John L. Males wrote:
> I just found out about your desire to have some workstation testing
> done to get feedback on your current VM patch.
> 
> I am currently using Kernel 2.4.9-ac18.  I am still not happy about
> some of the memory management.  I love to try your patch.  I would be
> willing to do so against the 2.4.10-ac11 Kernel if a patch is
> available.  If Alan is going to implement this patch in a later
> 2.4.10-acxx patch I will wait patiently.

Said patch and other VM work is in 2.4.10-ac12.  Get that and report
back.

	Robert Love


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re[04]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
  - From: "John L. Males" <jlmales@softhome.net>
- Re: Re[02]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
  - From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>

References:
- Re[02]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
  - From: "John L. Males" <jlmales@softhome.net>

Prev by Date: Re[02]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
Next by Date: Re[04]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
Prev by thread: Re[02]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
Next by thread: Re[04]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread