[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9

To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Subject: Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:28:31 +0200
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox),rfuller@nsisoftware.com (Rob Fuller),linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <E15jpRy-0003yt-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm@kvack.org
References: <E15jpRy-0003yt-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

On September 20, 2001 12:04 am, Alan Cox wrote:
> Reverse mappings make linear aging easier to do but are not critical (we
> can walk all physical pages via the page map array).

But you can't pick up the referenced bit that way, so no up aging, only
down.

--
Daniel

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9
  - From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
- Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9
  - From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

References:
- Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9
  - From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: -__PAGE_OFFSET
Next by Date: Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9
Prev by thread: Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9
Next by thread: Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread