[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9
On September 17, 2001 06:03 pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> In linux we have avoided reverse maps (unlike the BSD's) which tends
> to make the common case fast at the expense of making it more
> difficult to handle times when the VM system is under extreme load and
> we are swapping etc.
What do you suppose is the cost of the reverse map? I get the impression you
think it's more expensive than it is.
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/