[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Changes in vm_operations_struct 2.2.x => 2.4.x

To: Martin Maletinsky <maletinsky@scs.ch>
Subject: Re: Changes in vm_operations_struct 2.2.x => 2.4.x
From: Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 00:49:10 +0200
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <3B6A5A52.73D0DC12@scs.ch>; from maletinsky@scs.ch on Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:01:22AM +0200
References: <3B6A5A52.73D0DC12@scs.ch>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i

On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:01:22AM +0200, Martin Maletinsky wrote:
> Does anyone know the reason why the number of operations in
> vm_operation_struct has been reduced?

Al Viro reduced it, because nobody used them for several years.
Nobody complained after removing them, also.

Maybe you can explain more, what you try to do in your module and
people can help you.

Regards

Ingo Oeser
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Changes in vm_operations_struct 2.2.x => 2.4.x
  - From: Martin Maletinsky <maletinsky@scs.ch>

References:
- Changes in vm_operations_struct 2.2.x => 2.4.x
  - From: Martin Maletinsky <maletinsky@scs.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: Swapping anonymous pages
Next by Date: Re: Changes in vm_operations_struct 2.2.x => 2.4.x
Prev by thread: Changes in vm_operations_struct 2.2.x => 2.4.x
Next by thread: Re: Changes in vm_operations_struct 2.2.x => 2.4.x
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread