[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Removal of PG_marker scheme from 2.4.6-pre

To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: Removal of PG_marker scheme from 2.4.6-pre
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:46:22 -0300 (BRT)
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0107012301460.19985-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org


On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> > In pre7:
> >
> > "me: undo page_launder() LRU changes, they have nasty side effects"
> >
> > Can you be more verbose about this ?
> 
> I think this was fixed by the GFP_BUFFER vs. GFP_CAN_FS + GFP_CAN_IO
> thing and Linus accidentally backed out the wrong code ;)
> 
> cheers,
> Rik

Nope.

-ac also freezes and it does not have the GFP_BUFFER changes. 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

References:
- Re: Removal of PG_marker scheme from 2.4.6-pre
  - From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>

Prev by Date: China-diesel fuel injection 7/03
Next by Date: [PATCH] initial detailed VM statistics code
Prev by thread: Re: Removal of PG_marker scheme from 2.4.6-pre
Next by thread: again, no dirty pages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread