[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: page_launder() bug

To: tori@tellus.mine.nu (Tobias Ringstrom)
Subject: Re: page_launder() bug
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 11:52:26 +0100 (BST)
Cc: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller), chromi@cyberspace.org (Jonathan Morton), szabi@inf.elte.hu (BERECZ Szabolcs), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105070823060.24073-100000@svea.tellus> from "Tobias Ringstrom" at May 07, 2001 08:26:58 AM
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

> > It is the most straightforward way to make a '1' or '0'
> > integer from the NULL state of a pointer.
> 
> But is it really specified in the C "standards" to be exctly zero or one,
> and not zero and non-zero?

Yes. (Fortunately since when this argument occurred Linus said he would eat
his underpants if he was wrong)

Alan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

References:
- Re: page_launder() bug
  - From: Tobias Ringstrom <tori@tellus.mine.nu>

Prev by Date: Re: page_launder() bug
Next by Date: No Subject
Prev by thread: Re: page_launder() bug
Next by thread: Re: page_launder() bug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread