[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About reading /proc/*/mem
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Richard F Weber wrote:
> See this is where I start seeming to have problems. I can open
> /proc/*/mem & lseek, but reads come back as "No such process". However,
> if I first do a ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH), then I can read the data, but the
> process stops. I've kind of dug through the sys_ptrace() code under
> /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c, and can see and understand
> generally what it's doing, but that's getting into serious kernel-land
> stuff. I wouldn't expect it to be this difficult to just open up
> another processes /proc/*/mem file to read data from.
> Is there something obvious I'm missing? It seems to keep pointing back
> to ptrace & /proc/*/mem are very closely related (ie: the same)
> including stopping of the child.
OK, here's something I really don't understand. Suppose that I tell your
debugger to tell me when in the executed program foo becomes greater than
bar[0] + 14. Or when cyclic list foo becomes longer than 1 element
(i.e. foo.next != foo.prev).
How do you do that if program is running? If you don't guarantee that
it doesn't run during the access to its memory (moreover, between sever
such accesses) - the data you get is worthless.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/