[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC: Bouncebuffer fixes

To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Subject: Re: RFC: Bouncebuffer fixes
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 10:14:36 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010429154227.E11395@athlon.random>
Reply-To: <mingo@elte.hu>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> just in case, also make sure you merged in my fixes as well, the first
> patch I seen was buggy and could deadlock the machine for MM unrelated
> reasons.

all the deadlock-unrelated fixes were merged into the -ac tree long ago,
so that is certainly not the cause of the deadlock.

please re-check whether there are any fixes missing in the latest ac tree
+ Arjan's fixes.

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

Prev by Date: Re: Hopefully a simple question on /proc/pid/mem
Next by Date: Re: Hopefully a simple question on /proc/pid/mem
Prev by thread: Re: Hopefully a simple question on /proc/pid/mem
Next by thread: About reading /proc/*/mem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread