[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

__GFP_IO && shrink_[d|i]cache_memory()?



i've seen a couple of GFP_BUFFER allocation deadlocks in an atypical
system which had lots of RAM allocated to inodes. The reason for the
deadlock is that the shrink_*() functions cannot be called if __GFP_IO is
not set. Nothing else can be freed at that point, so the try_again: loop
in page_alloc() gets into an infinite loop.

as an immediate solution the previous __GFP_WAIT suggestion solves the
deadlock - because the GFP_BUFFER allocator yields the CPU and kswapd can
run and do the dcache/icache shrinking. [i cannot reproduce any deadlocks
after doing this change.]

as a longer term solution, i'm wondering how hard it would be to propagate
gfp_mask into the shrink_*() functions, and prevent recursion similarly to
the swap-out logic? This way even GFP_BUFFER allocators could touch/free
the dcache/icache.

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/