[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: stack overflow

To: Mark Hemment <markhe@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: stack overflow
From: Zeshan Ahmad <zeshan_uet@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 12:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: tigran@veritas.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

Hi

I have figured out why the patch is'nt working. 

Mark wrote:
>In my original, the code assumes that all general
>purpose slabs below
>"bufctl_limit" where suitable for bufctl allocation 
>(look at a 2.2.x
>version, in kmem_cache_sizes_init() I have a state
>variable called
>"found").
  
Since I am already using 2.2.x, so the patch is not
working. This means i am already using the variable
"found".
So this will not work i presume.

Any other solution available?

Regards
Zeshan

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: stack overflow
  - From: Mark Hemment <markhe@veritas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Re: simple FS application that hangs 2.4-test5, mem mgmtproblem or FS buffer cache mgmt problem?
Next by Date: kernel stack overflow
Prev by thread: Re: stack overflow
Next by thread: Re: stack overflow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread