[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Memory partitioning
- To: Santosh Eraniose <santosh@sony.co.in>
- Subject: Re: Memory partitioning
- From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 09:51:57 +0200
- Cc: Linux-MM@kvack.org
- In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20000822155755.00aa3e00@192.168.1.9>; from santosh@sony.co.in on Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 04:02:51PM +0530
- References: <4.3.2.7.0.20000822155755.00aa3e00@192.168.1.9>
- Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 04:02:51PM +0530, Santosh Eraniose wrote:
> Is it possible to partition the MMU such that multiple OS
> can run on the same platform.
> In all examples I see like MKLinux , the mem mgmt of Linux is mapped to the
> underlying Mach kernel.
> The other extreme is as in RTAI (Real time App Interface), where the MMU is
> handled by linux, but the
> scheduling is done by RTAI.
Several approaches:
- IBM S390 can partition the hardware. In cooperation with IBM's VM this
allows to completly - and efficiently - subdivide the machine into multiple
virtual machines. VMs can even nest.
- Less perfect due to not available VM-like software and no support of the
hardware as on the S390 for example Sun's E10000 or SGI Origin 2000/3000
offer partitioning. This style of partitioning is mostly implemented
by the hardware of the machines.
The two approaches guarantee that even a virtual machine or partition that goes nuts can't crash another virtual machine or partition.
- Not implemented but in theory implementable would be multiple kernels
running on top RTLinux's realtime kernel.
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/