[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pte_pagenr/MAP_NR deleted in pre6

To: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller)
Subject: Re: pte_pagenr/MAP_NR deleted in pre6
From: Kanoj Sarcar <kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, sct@redhat.com, roman@augan.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, nico@cam.org, davidm@hpl.hp.com
In-Reply-To: <200008171920.MAA23931@pizda.ninka.net> from "David S. Miller" at Aug 17, 2000 12:20:50 PM
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

> 
>    Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:19:59 +0100 (BST)
>    From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> 
>    > My only two gripes about paddr_t is that long long is not only
>    > expensive but has been also known to be buggy on 32-bit platforms.
> 
>    Except for the x86 36bit abortion do we need a long long paddr_t on any
>    32bit platform ?
> 
> Sparc32, mips32...
>

Not for Indys on mips32. Is there a mips32 port on another machine
(currently in Linux, or port ongoing) that requires this?

Kanoj
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

References:
- Re: pte_pagenr/MAP_NR deleted in pre6
  - From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>

Prev by Date: Re: pte_pagenr/MAP_NR deleted in pre6
Next by Date: Re: pte_pagenr/MAP_NR deleted in pre6
Prev by thread: Re: pte_pagenr/MAP_NR deleted in pre6
Next by thread: Re: pte_pagenr/MAP_NR deleted in pre6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread