[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on

To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
From: James Manning <jmm@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:01:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20000717102811.D5127@redhat.com>; from sct@redhat.com on Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:28:11AM +0100
Mail-Followup-To: linux-mm@kvack.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007111503520.10961-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <200007170709.DAA27512@ocelot.cc.gatech.edu> <20000717102811.D5127@redhat.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

[Stephen C. Tweedie]
> > Having said that, LRU is certainly broken, but there are other ways to
> > fix it.
> 
> Right.  LFU is just one way of fixing LRU.

Just food for thought for anyone wanting to read up on other algorithms
and a decent explanation of the basic problem.

http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~solomon/cs537/paging.html
-- 
James Manning <jmm@computer.org>
GPG Key fingerprint = B913 2FBD 14A9 CE18 B2B7  9C8E A0BF B026 EEBB F6E4

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
  - From: "Scott F. Kaplan" <sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on2.4.0-test2
  - From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
  - From: yannis@cc.gatech.edu (Yannis Smaragdakis)
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
  - From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
  - From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
Prev by thread: Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread