[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new latency report

To: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
Subject: Re: new latency report
From: Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:38:23 -0500 (CDT)
cc: Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@norran.net>, "linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu" <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "linux-audio-dev@ginette.musique.umontreal.ca" <linux-audio-dev@ginette.musique.umontreal.ca>
In-Reply-To: <39654CCC.9DE5000E@uow.edu.au>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Try adding the attached patch to your existing tree.  It fixes a lot
> of stuff.  sys_close() and sys_exit() still need attention.

Consider making a macro UGLYSCHEDULINGPOINT for these additions so that we
can find these easily and maybe easily switch between normal and
lowlatency for benchmarking. The 'UGLY' is to do dissuade people from
overuse.

--
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

References:
- Re: new latency report
  - From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>

Prev by Date: sys_exit() and zap_page_range()
Next by Date: Re: sys_exit() and zap_page_range()
Prev by thread: Re: new latency report
Next by thread: Re: new latency report
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread