Re: [PATCH] VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7

["Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 04:11:20PM +0200, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> 
> But for persistence we now have the shm dentries (We will have at
> least. I am planning to reuse the ramfs directory handling for shm
> fs. This locks the dentries into the cache for persistence). 
> 
> Couldn't we use this to get the desired behaviour? 

No, the dentries make things neat for the VFS but they don't help
the VM at all.

Cheers,
 Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/