[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Oops in __free_pages_ok (pre7-1) (Long)

To: "Juan J. Quintela" <quintela@fi.udc.es>
Subject: Re: Oops in __free_pages_ok (pre7-1) (Long)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 13:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Kanoj Sarcar <kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <yttg0s13gjx.fsf@vexeta.dc.fi.udc.es>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

On 2 May 2000, Juan J. Quintela wrote:
> Hi
>         several people have reported Oops in __free_pages_ok, after a
> BUG() in page_alloc.h.  This happens in 2.3.99-pre[67].  The BUGs are:

I'd like ot know what the back-trace for those reports are? 

I'm not against getting rid of the PageSwapEntry logic (it's complication
for not very much gain), but I'd like to understand this more..

		Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oops in __free_pages_ok (pre7-1) (Long)
  - From: "Juan J. Quintela" <quintela@fi.udc.es>

References:
- Re: Oops in __free_pages_ok (pre7-1) (Long)
  - From: "Juan J. Quintela" <quintela@fi.udc.es>

Prev by Date: Re: kswapd @ 60-80% CPU during heavy HD i/o.
Next by Date: Re: kswapd @ 60-80% CPU during heavy HD i/o.
Prev by thread: Re: Oops in __free_pages_ok (pre7-1) (Long)
Next by thread: Re: Oops in __free_pages_ok (pre7-1) (Long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread