[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] pre7-1 semicolon & nicely readableB



On Tue, 2 May 2000, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> > I want to inform you that you're wrong. The only difference is
> > in readability.
> 
> [..]
> 
> > In fact, the <10 test is only there to prevent infinite looping
> > for when a process with 0 swap_cnt "slips through" the tests above.
> 
> If such a value should never "slip through", then, for
> readability, you want an assert (e.g. BUG() ).

It's ok for them to slip through, it's just not ok for the kernel
to go into an infinite loop here...

Rik
--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.

Wanna talk about the kernel?  irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
http://www.conectiva.com/		http://www.surriel.com/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/