[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing

To: Kanoj Sarcar <kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 03:27:15 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <200001140113.RAA62584@google.engr.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Kanoj Sarcar wrote:

> But as Linus points out, recovering from that is not that costly
> (the page will be in the swapcache mostly, its just the cost of 
> the page fault).
> 
> What about stealing the page only if the corresponding zone is
> also running unbalanced?

(this is exactly what i'm talking about.)

-- mingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.nl.linux.org/Linux-MM/

References:
- Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
  - From: kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar)

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
Prev by thread: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread