[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing

To: kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar)
Subject: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:53:44 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli), riel@nl.linux.org (Rik van Riel), torvalds@transmeta.com, mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <200001132150.NAA28314@google.engr.sgi.com> from "Kanoj Sarcar" at Jan 13, 2000 01:50:53 PM
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org

> > We might not make good choices to free ISA DMA pages, you are correct yes
> 
> And given a huge enough HIGHMEM zone, we might not make good choices to free
> regular memory too, right?

I've got no empirical evidence from 2.2.x that the theoretical case occurs.

Alan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.nl.linux.org/Linux-MM/

References:
- Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
  - From: kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar)

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
Prev by thread: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread