[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Results: pre6 vs pre6+zlatko's_patch vs pre5 vs arcavm13
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@e-mind.com>, brent verner <damonbrent@earthlink.net>, "Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net>, Kalle Andersson <kalle.andersson@mbox303.swipnet.se>, Zlatko Calusic <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>, Ben McCann <bmccann@indusriver.com>, bredelin@ucsd.edu, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
- Subject: Re: Results: pre6 vs pre6+zlatko's_patch vs pre5 vs arcavm13
- From: Steve Bergman <steve@netplus.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:57:02 -0600
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.990110105015.7668E-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <36990DB5.DA6AE432@netplus.net>
- Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Here are updated results including arcavm16:
116 Image test in 128MB:
pre6+zlatko's_patch 2:35
and with requested change 3:09
pre6 2:27
pre5 1:58
arcavm13 9:13
arcavm15 1:59
pre-7 2:41
arcavm16 1:54
For the kernel compile test in 12MB:
Elapsed Maj. Min. Swaps
----- ------ ------ -----
pre6+zlatko_patch 22:14 383206 204482 57823
and with requested change 22:23 378662 198194 51445
pre6 20:54 352934 191210 48678
pre5 19:35 334680 183732 93427
arcavm13 19:45 344452 180243 38977
arcavm15 20:07 N/A N/A N/A
pre-7 21:14 356386 192835 50912
arcavm16 20:09 N/A N/A N/A
I think it's better than arcavm15 on the image test and the same on the compile
test.
-Steve
--
This is a majordomo managed list. To unsubscribe, send a message with
the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org