[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Results: arcavm15, et. al.
- To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@e-mind.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, brent verner <damonbrent@earthlink.net>, "Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net>, Kalle Andersson <kalle.andersson@mbox303.swipnet.se>, Zlatko Calusic <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>, Ben McCann <bmccann@indusriver.com>, bredelin@ucsd.edu, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
- Subject: Results: arcavm15, et. al.
- From: Steve Bergman <steve@netplus.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 16:50:58 -0600
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990110215759.2341A-100000@laser.bogus> <369920F3.E9940FAA@netplus.net>
- Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
For the image load test:
pre6+zlatko's_patch 2:35
and with requested change 3:09
pre6 2:27
pre5 1:58
arcavm13 9:13
arcavm15 1:59
For the kernel compile test:
In 12MB:
Elapsed Maj. Min. Swaps
----- ------ ------ -----
pre6+zlatko_patch 22:14 383206 204482 57823
and with requested change 22:23 378662 198194 51445
pre6 20:54 352934 191210 48678
pre5 19:35 334680 183732 93427
arcavm13 19:45 344452 180243 38977
arcavm15 20:07 N/A N/A N/A
Arcavm15 looks very good. pre5 and arcavm13 look a bit better but of the
kernels with the anti-deadlock code it looks the best so far. ( I assume that
being based upon pre6 it's safe.)
The battery in my palmtop died so I don't have the page fault and swaps results
available for arcavm15. I'll grab the pre-7.gz patch and see how it does.
-Steve
--
This is a majordomo managed list. To unsubscribe, send a message with
the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org