[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Results: pre6 vs pre6+zlatko's_patch vs pre5 vs arcavm13
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
- Subject: Re: Results: pre6 vs pre6+zlatko's_patch vs pre5 vs arcavm13
- From: Steve Bergman <steve@netplus.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 14:29:41 -0600
- CC: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@e-mind.com>, brent verner <damonbrent@earthlink.net>, "Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net>, Kalle Andersson <kalle.andersson@mbox303.swipnet.se>, Zlatko Calusic <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>, Ben McCann <bmccann@indusriver.com>, bredelin@ucsd.edu, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.990110105015.7668E-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
- Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The logic for that would be something like the attached patch to
> page_alloc.c..
I tried the patch in the 'image test' and it helped little if any. Still a lot
of swapping in and the numbers are close enough that I'm not sure it helped at
all. This was a comparison between vanilla pre6 and vanilla
pre6+page_alloc_patch with no other patches applied.
-Steve
--
This is a majordomo managed list. To unsubscribe, send a message with
the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org