[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Results: 2.2.0-pre5 vs arcavm10 vs arcavm9 vs arcavm7
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
- Subject: Re: Results: 2.2.0-pre5 vs arcavm10 vs arcavm9 vs arcavm7
- From: Zlatko Calusic <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>
- Date: 07 Jan 1999 20:38:49 +0100
- Cc: Steve Bergman <steve@netplus.net>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@e-mind.com>, brent verner <damonbrent@earthlink.net>, "Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net>, Kalle Andersson <kalle.andersson@mbox303.swipnet.se>, Ben McCann <bmccann@indusriver.com>, bredelin@ucsd.edu, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
- In-Reply-To: Zlatko Calusic's message of "07 Jan 1999 19:44:18 +0100"
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.990107093240.4270F-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <87iueiudml.fsf@atlas.CARNet.hr>
- Reply-To: Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr
- Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.070069 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.69) XEmacs/21.0 (Poitou)
Zlatko Calusic <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr> writes:
> 2) In pre-5, under heavy load, free memory is hovering around
> freepages.min instead of being somewhere between freepages.low &
> freepages.max. This could make trouble for bursts of atomic
> allocations (networking!).
>
To followup myself, don't trust me, check your logfiles:
Jan 7 20:12:03 atlas kernel: eth0: Insufficient memory; nuking packet.
Jan 7 20:12:05 atlas last message repeated 64 times
Uaaa, it's baaack... :)
--
Zlatko
--
This is a majordomo managed list. To unsubscribe, send a message with
the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org