[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: update re: fork() failures in 2.1.101
[CC-ed to linux-mm, and it should stay that way...]
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Paul Kimoto wrote:
> For completeness, here is the fragmentation report for each:
> > Jun 18 01:24:48 ( 48*4kB 7*8kB 1*16kB 1*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB = 680kB)
> > Jun 18 18:03:53 ( 1*4kB 28*8kB 39*16kB 2*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB = 1108kB)
Damn, this looks near-perfect for normal system load...
I really don't understand what's wrong.
> If you have other suggestions for things to try, with the reduction in
> memory (from 48 MB) the problems seem to arise in about half the time.
I wonder what kind of software / networking app you are using,
and what memory usage those programs have...
Rik.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+