From owner-linux-mm-bugs@nl.linux.org Wed Aug 8 16:32:54 2001 Received: (root@humbolt.nl.linux.org) by humbolt.nl.linux.org id ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:32:36 +0200 Received: from distro.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.149]:61193 "EHLO distro.conectiva.com.br") by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:32:32 +0200 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by distro.conectiva.com.br (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f78EAXP30245; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:10:33 -0300 Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:10:33 -0300 Message-Id: <200108081410.f78EAXP30245@distro.conectiva.com.br> From: bugzilla-daemon@distro.conectiva.com.br To: linux-mm-bugs@nl.linux.org Subject: [Bug 1203 (linux mm)] Changed - 2.5: load control Sender: owner-linux-mm-bugs@nl.linux.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-mm-bugs@nl.linux.org Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"| /bin/marchive -a -m -f /home/majordomo/public_html/linux-mm-bugs/folders/linux-mm-bugs"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mm-bugs-list http://distro.conectiva.com.br/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1203 ------- Additional Comments From riel@conectiva.com.br 2001-08-08 11:10 ------- well, I have the mechanisms for suspending and waking up processes working, but that's not enough for load control ... ... the scheduling is still failing ;/ To be more precise, load control is perfectly able to reduce the load on the system, but it doesn't manage to stop the applications from thrashing. These two things turned out to be very different. - Linux-mm-bugs: bugzilla list for the Linux-MM subsystem Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-mm-bugs/ Web site: http://linux-mm.org/ Development: linux-mm@kvack.org From owner-linux-mm-bugs@nl.linux.org Wed Aug 8 16:33:14 2001 Received: (root@humbolt.nl.linux.org) by humbolt.nl.linux.org id ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:32:56 +0200 Received: from distro.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.149]:61193 "EHLO distro.conectiva.com.br") by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:32:37 +0200 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by distro.conectiva.com.br (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f78E8vA30217; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:08:57 -0300 Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:08:57 -0300 Message-Id: <200108081408.f78E8vA30217@distro.conectiva.com.br> From: bugzilla-daemon@distro.conectiva.com.br To: linux-mm-bugs@nl.linux.org Subject: [Bug 1186 (linux mm)] Changed - 2.4.1: OOM killer doesn't trigger Sender: owner-linux-mm-bugs@nl.linux.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-mm-bugs@nl.linux.org Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"| /bin/marchive -a -m -f /home/majordomo/public_html/linux-mm-bugs/folders/linux-mm-bugs"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mm-bugs-list http://distro.conectiva.com.br/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1186 riel@conectiva.com.br changed: What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From riel@conectiva.com.br 2001-08-08 11:08 ------- OK, even with the swap reclaim patch in 2.4.7-ac9 the OOM killer still works lets get rid of this bug ;) - Linux-mm-bugs: bugzilla list for the Linux-MM subsystem Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-mm-bugs/ Web site: http://linux-mm.org/ Development: linux-mm@kvack.org