Re: Win NT article on Linux deficiencies

["Mattthew D. Pitts" <mpitts@suite224.net>]

Guys,
Linux 2.2 wasn't out yet when this article was written, so some of the
statements were "kinda" accurate.

----------
> From: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@SCO.com>
> To: linux-future@nl.linux.org
> Subject: Re: Win NT article on Linux deficiencies
> Date: Tuesday, March 09, 1999 4:05 AM
> 
> This incident (if you are really interested about what happened to it)
> has been thoroughly discussed on KML (linux-kernel mailing list).
> Search the archives and examine, and you shall find the truth.
> 
> In summary - the guy who wrote is not a complete idiot, but a very
> intelligent member of the society. Why would an intelligent human say a
> word against Linux is beyond me but I did not have time to find out :)
> 
> Regards,
> ------
> Tigran A. Aivazian           | http://www.sco.com
> Escalations Research Group   | tel: +44-(0)1923-813796
> Santa Cruz Operation Ltd     | http://www.aivazian.demon.co.uk
> 
> On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Billy Harvey wrote:
> 
> > Could the more knowledgeable take a look at this?
> > http://www.winntmag.com/Magazine/Article.cfm?IssueID=97&ArticleID=4502 
> > 
> > It almost looks like it was written after the discussion a couple of
> > months ago about threads vs processes.  I'm particularly concerned
> > about the accuracy, and hence acceptance as gospel by industry due to
> > the source, of the concluding paragraph:
> 
> -
> Linux-future: thinking about the future of the Linux kernel
> Archive:      http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/
> Wish list:    http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mert0236/linux-future.html
Matthew D. Pitts

-
Linux-future: thinking about the future of the Linux kernel
Archive:      http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/
Wish list:    http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mert0236/linux-future.html