Re: Win NT article on Linux deficiencies

[Tigran Aivazian <tigran@SCO.com>]

This incident (if you are really interested about what happened to it)
has been thoroughly discussed on KML (linux-kernel mailing list).
Search the archives and examine, and you shall find the truth.

In summary - the guy who wrote is not a complete idiot, but a very
intelligent member of the society. Why would an intelligent human say a
word against Linux is beyond me but I did not have time to find out :)

Regards,
------
Tigran A. Aivazian           | http://www.sco.com
Escalations Research Group   | tel: +44-(0)1923-813796
Santa Cruz Operation Ltd     | http://www.aivazian.demon.co.uk

On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Billy Harvey wrote:

> Could the more knowledgeable take a look at this?
> http://www.winntmag.com/Magazine/Article.cfm?IssueID=97&ArticleID=4502 
> 
> It almost looks like it was written after the discussion a couple of
> months ago about threads vs processes.  I'm particularly concerned
> about the accuracy, and hence acceptance as gospel by industry due to
> the source, of the concluding paragraph:

-
Linux-future: thinking about the future of the Linux kernel
Archive:      http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/
Wish list:    http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mert0236/linux-future.html