[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Win NT article on Linux deficiencies

To: linux-future@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: Win NT article on Linux deficiencies
From: Keith Duthie <psycho@albatross.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:57:09 +1300 (NZDT)
cc: Geoff Winans <midngt@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19990309033936.11630.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: linux-future@nl.linux.org
Sender: owner-linux-future@humbolt.nl.linux.org

On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Geoff Winans wrote:

> Repost to this, looks like the standish group got embarrassed, and 
> forced LT to take it off. :(
> 
> Oh well, it was funny.
If anyone wants to see it, I've got a copy from my cache. Isn't squid
great? ;-)

-- 
.sig under deconstruction. Please watch out for falling stars.
           +++ATL3           O-        +++ATM2

-
Linux-future: thinking about the future of the Linux kernel
Archive:      http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/
Wish list:    http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mert0236/linux-future.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Win NT article on Linux deficiencies
  - From: "Eric R. Buddington" <ebuddington@mail.wesleyan.edu>

References:
- Re: Win NT article on Linux deficiencies
  - From: "Geoff Winans" <midngt@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Reflection and /proc
Next by Date: Re: Reflection and /proc
Prev by thread: Re: Win NT article on Linux deficiencies
Next by thread: Re: Win NT article on Linux deficiencies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread