From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Tue Feb 01 17:13:41 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1Cw0eo-0006S1-SB; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:13:38 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:13:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.112.240.26] (helo=mail.tnnet.fi) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1Cw0e7-0006MS-B5 for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:12:55 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B39D2E4D54; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:12:23 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09962-03; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:12:20 +0200 (EET) Received: from armas (a64.adsl.tnnet.fi [217.112.242.64]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF95F344F4; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:12:20 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=users.sourceforge.net) by armas with esmtp (Exim) id 1Cw0dY-0000pC-00; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:12:20 +0200 Message-ID: <41FFAA64.A15AAC7A@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:12:20 +0200 From: Jari Ruusu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.22aa1r8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter_22@gmx.de Cc: info@acculin.com, linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: Hello and DVD-ROM encryption References: <41FE52F5.39D3D868@users.sourceforge.net> <13316.1107209693@www13.gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.tnnet.fi Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Peter_22@gmx.de wrote: > Jari Ruusu wrote: > > Identical ciphertexts leak information. >=20 > I must admit, I didn=B4t get that. Mkisofs -r dirtree builds an ISO ima= ge > which I pipe through aespipe. You mean I shouldn=B4t use one keyfile tw= ice > for doing this? If same key file is used for multiple partitions, then adversary can easi= ly detect what sectors are identical on different partitions. Identical plaintext data on different sectors on same file system are not a problem because sector number is used in IV computation, and sector number is guaranteed to be unique on one file system. > But you are not concerned that an attacker may find the key to the data= in > the first 8192 bytes? Storing key file somewhere else improves security, but re-using same key file for multiple partitions opens a weakness. > 3.3. Example 3 - Encrypted DVD-R [snip] > What would you say about this? Ok for one DVD. Not ok for two or more DVDs. > Will that dvd lock-up again when opening one of its folders containing > some 30,000 files in it? Will there be problems with reads at/after end= of > disk and such? Lockups with 30k files on one directory sound more like file system implementation bug. --=20 Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 = DD - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Wed Feb 02 06:45:53 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CwDKo-0003iS-Am; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 06:45:50 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Wed, 02 Feb 2005 06:45:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from anumail3.anu.edu.au ([150.203.2.43] helo=anu.edu.au) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CwDK3-0003gY-4I for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 06:45:03 +0100 Received: from anumail.anu.edu.au (anumail.anu.edu.au [150.203.2.90]) by anu.edu.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j125iiol026007 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:44:47 +1100 (EST) Received: from [150.203.51.79] (biojanus.anu.edu.au [150.203.51.79]) by anumail.anu.edu.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j125iiWO015253 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:44:44 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <420068C6.5010402@anu.edu.au> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:44:38 +1100 From: Paul Wayper Organization: Australian National University User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041113) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: Hello and DVD-ROM encryption References: <41FE52F5.39D3D868@users.sourceforge.net> <13316.1107209693@www13.gmx.net> <41FFAA64.A15AAC7A@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <41FFAA64.A15AAC7A@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by anu.edu.au id j125iiol026007 Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: paul.wayper@anu.edu.au Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Jari Ruusu wrote: >Peter_22@gmx.de wrote: > =20 > >>Jari Ruusu wrote: >> =20 >> >>>Identical ciphertexts leak information. >>> =20 >>> >>I must admit, I didn=B4t get that. Mkisofs -r dirtree builds an ISO ima= ge >>which I pipe through aespipe. You mean I shouldn=B4t use one keyfile tw= ice >>for doing this? >> =20 >> > >If same key file is used for multiple partitions, then adversary can eas= ily >detect what sectors are identical on different partitions. Identical >plaintext data on different sectors on same file system are not a proble= m >because sector number is used in IV computation, and sector number is >guaranteed to be unique on one file system. > =20 > Wouldn't this be negated by the fact that you're initialising the=20 storage space for the ISO with /dev/urandom? This would be a fairly=20 good guarantee that blank sectors (the most likely things to be=20 identical) are going to still be different. I thought ISO images=20 wouldn't include any unused blocks, anyway, which would also mean that=20 blank sectors would be irrelevant. And therefore, if you're not writing identical files in identical=20 locations, isn't the risk associated with reusing a set of keys reduced? Another way of going about this might be to write a file from=20 /dev/urandom at the size you want and set this up as an loop-AES file=20 system. Copy your files on and then unmount it. Then copy this=20 encrypted filesystem onto the disk. When you want to access it, just=20 use aespipe or loop-AES (not sure which, given the earlier argument=20 about blocksizes) to open that file as a filesystem. Why try to encrypt=20 the ISO image at all? Have fun, Paul --=20 -- Paul Wayper at ANU - +61 2 6125 0643 - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Wed Feb 02 16:34:46 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CwMWj-0004Xa-A5; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:34:45 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:33:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([217.112.240.26]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CwMVX-0004WX-Cm for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:33:31 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFE32A097A; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:33:23 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30509-03; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:33:21 +0200 (EET) Received: from armas (a64.adsl.tnnet.fi [217.112.242.64]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387FE1BD50; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:33:21 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=users.sourceforge.net) by armas with esmtp (Exim) id 1CwMVM-0001Nu-00; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:33:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4200F2C0.516B2076@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:33:20 +0200 From: Jari Ruusu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.22aa1r8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Wayper Cc: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: Hello and DVD-ROM encryption References: <41FE52F5.39D3D868@users.sourceforge.net> <13316.1107209693@www13.gmx.net> <41FFAA64.A15AAC7A@users.sourceforge.net> <420068C6.5010402@anu.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.tnnet.fi Received-SPF: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Paul Wayper wrote: > Jari Ruusu wrote: > >If same key file is used for multiple partitions, then adversary can easily > >detect what sectors are identical on different partitions. > > Wouldn't this be negated by the fact that you're initialising the > storage space for the ISO with /dev/urandom? This would be a fairly > good guarantee that blank sectors (the most likely things to be > identical) are going to still be different. I thought ISO images > wouldn't include any unused blocks, anyway, which would also mean that > blank sectors would be irrelevant. > > And therefore, if you're not writing identical files in identical > locations, isn't the risk associated with reusing a set of keys reduced? But why would anyone use same key file? There is no reason to do that. Peter's point was to keep the weakest part on USB-stick so attacker would not have access to it. The weakest part is the human memorizable passphrase that protects symmetrically encrypted key file or private keyring. Nothing prevents you from encrypting the per DVD key file using public key crypto and storing the weak part (human memorizable passphrase encrypted private keyring) to USB-stick. Simply point the gpghome= mount option to USB-stick (auto-)mounted directory. -- Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 03 01:45:48 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CwV7S-0003fY-1o; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:45:14 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:44:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from rahner-edv.de ([83.246.114.60] ident=postfix) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CwV6j-0003ed-MP for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:44:29 +0100 Received: by rahner-edv.de (Postfix, from userid 33) id 222FAD8A60; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 01:44:01 +0100 (CET) To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: WAMUBANK NOTICE: Customer Information From: Washington Mutual Bank Content-Type: text/html Message-Id: <20050203004401.222FAD8A60@rahner-edv.de> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 01:44:01 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=FRONTPAGE,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: customerservice@wamu.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Dear NetBank customer

Dear WaMu customer,

We recently noticed one or more attempts to log in your WaMu account from a foreign IP address and we have reasons to believe that your account was hijacked by a third party without your authorization.

If you recently accessed your account while traveling, the unusual log in attempts may have initiated by you.

However if you are the rightful holder of the account, click on the link below and submit, as we try to verify your account. (in case you are not enrolled use your Social Security Number as both User ID and Password.)

https://login.personal.wamu.c0m/logon/logon.asp?dd=1?check_user

The log in attempt was made from:

IP address: 158.0.55.157
ISP host: 158-0-55-1.T1fast.net

If you choose to ignore our request, you leave us no choice but to temporally suspend your account.

We ask that you allow at least 48hrs for the case to be investigated and we strongly recommend not making any changes to your account in that time.

If you received this notice and you are not the authorized account holder, please be aware that is in violation of WaMu policy to represent oneself as another WaMu account owner.Such action may also be in violation of local, national, and/or international law. 

WaMu is committed to assist law enforcement with any inquires related to attempts to misappropriate personal information with the Internet to commit fraud or theft.

Information will be provided at the request of law enforcement agencies to ensure that perpetrators are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

* Please do not respond to this email as your reply will not be received.

For assistance, log in to your WaMu account and choose the "HELP" link. 

Thanks for your patience as we work together to protect your account.

Regards,

The WaMu Corp. Copyright © 1996-2005. All rights reserved.

 
- Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 06 14:53:01 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CxmqH-0007eF-OJ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:52:49 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:51:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailin1.hostsupport.de ([213.203.205.3]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1Cxmo9-0007VW-SI for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:50:37 +0100 Received: (qmail 31567 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2005 13:50:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tanja) (info@snowgirl.net@82.135.15.97) by 213.203.205.3 with SMTP; 6 Feb 2005 13:50:09 -0000 From: To: Subject: AW: AW: AW: DVD-ROM encryption Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:50:25 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <1107137073.23927.31.camel@cunegonde.paulshome.acculin.com> Importance: Normal Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: info@snowgirl.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto >Note that whatever the file system is it won't be recognized by most DVD burning software, it looks like a random data stream.<< What I just have seen is, that there is also a problem with DVD-ROM drives not recognizing a crypted DVD as a valid medium. It seems because there is a random stream on it (at least it looks like it), the drive does think it is garbage and won't allow me to mount. With the DVD-burner, it worked, but I have that in a different pc than the crypto-setup Does anyone know how to fix that? or are there some DVD-ROMS who will recognize the DVDs? >> The question is how much data fits on DVD? 4.0 or 4.4GB? >4,700,000,000 Bytes without overburn, about 4.4GB, my current images are 4699996160 bytes.<< Oh. I never was able to manage to get more than about 4.1 GB on a DVD, since bigger files caused NERO to warn me of oversized Image file... About LOOP-AES and AES-PIPE (Why is it called AES anyway - from what I've read, there are multiple ciphers avaiable not only AES) - are they in the gentoo-library? I mean, can I install them with gentoos "emerge". I found aes-pipe: : emerge search aes * app-crypt/aespipe Latest version available: 2.2a Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ] Size of downloaded files: 72 kB Homepage: http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net Description: Encrypts data from stdin to stdout. License: GPL-2 but not aes-loop or loop-aes. I was wondering, if aes-pipe is there why not the (required?) loop-aes? Or is it hidden? Ciao fLares - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Mon Feb 07 15:36:38 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CyA0A-0001gh-0p; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:36:34 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:35:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [65.19.163.244] (helo=mail0.rayservers.com) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1Cy9yz-0001dn-4W for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:35:21 +0100 Received: (qmail 19506 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2005 09:36:55 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.2?) (venkat@rayservers.com@12.31.6.2) by 0 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2005 09:36:55 -0500 Message-ID: <42077CDA.4020808@rayservers.com> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:36:10 -0500 From: Venkat Manakkal User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: [Fwd: Re: AW: AW: AW: DVD-ROM encryption] X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: venkat@rayservers.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sending a copy to the list... - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: DVD-ROM encryption Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:33:34 -0500 From: Venkat Manakkal To: info@snowgirl.net References: | About LOOP-AES and AES-PIPE (Why is it called AES anyway - from what I've | read, there are multiple ciphers avaiable not only AES) - are they in the | gentoo-library? I mean, can I install them with gentoos "emerge". I found | aes-pipe: | | : emerge search aes | * app-crypt/aespipe | Latest version available: 2.2a | Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ] | Size of downloaded files: 72 kB | Homepage: http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net | Description: Encrypts data from stdin to stdout. | License: GPL-2 The following is for Gentoo users: You should really be using aespipe 2.3a. Portage has just not been updated, I have an open bug on the gentoo bugzilla. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52046 You can prod them a bit to update portage... In the meantime you can do the following as root: 1. Uncomment the PORTAGE_OVERLAY in /etc/make. 2. mkdir /usr/local/portage 3. mkdir /usr/local/portage/app-crypt 4. cp -r /usr/portage/app-crypt/aespipe /usr/local/portage/app-crypt 5. cd /usr/local/portage/app-crypt/aespipe 6. cp aespipe-2.2a.ebuild aespipe-2.3a.ebuild 7. ebuild aespipe-2.3a.ebuild fetch 8. ebuild aespipe-2.3a.ebuild digest #after checking GPG sig 9. USE="static" emerge -pv aespipe | but not aes-loop or loop-aes. I was wondering, if aes-pipe is there why not | the (required?) loop-aes? Or is it hidden? Loop-aes is not in portage since it involves building modules for your kernel and writing and testing an e-build for every kernel variant is difficult. Feel free to make an e-build if you can and post to Gentoo bugzilla. Best regards, - ---Venkat. - -- http://www.rayservers.com/ Computers. Installed Secure. OpenPGP. AES Encrypted HD. Colocation. Tel:+1-607-546-7300 Fax:+1-607-546-7387 Skype: rayservers PGP/GPG Key: https://www.rayservers.com/keys/0x12430522.asc 4856 01AB F8BA E0EB F128 A57F 59D9 16FD 1243 0522 Your Privacy and Security are our Business [TM] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCB3zZWdkW/RJDBSIRAnzMAJ9ekzr3ZJsL9M/Df/+b18/sUzI1IgCg0zpR F/m55/ZxwsWgiXM93MclakA= =XzSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Wed Feb 09 00:28:22 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CyemK-0006nh-5G; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:28:20 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:27:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from vsmtp3alice.tin.it ([212.216.176.143] helo=vsmtp3.tin.it) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CyelT-0006ce-CP; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:27:27 +0100 Received: from ims2c.cp.tin.it (192.168.70.102) by vsmtp3.tin.it (7.0.027) id 4200F9A7003B6E4A; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:25:40 +0100 Received: from [192.168.70.228] by ims2c.cp.tin.it with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:25:39 +0100 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:25:39 +0100 Message-ID: <4200073C00064D4B@ims2c.cp.tin.it> From: mikebello@virgilio.it Subject: A GOOD NEWS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: 80.179.242.218 Bcc: Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SBL, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: **** X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: mikebello@virgilio.it Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto ATTN: HONORABLE CONTRACTOR Dear Sir, Sequel to the secretive arrangement in regards of the shipment of your co= ntract sum, I wish to inform you that all necessary modalities have been automat= ically concluded and have left Nigeria to London via your Country today by Express Cargo Flight. Note carefully the content of the crate is "MONEY" but I did not disclose= it to the Courier Services as Money, rather I informed them that the crat= e contain Vital "DIPLOMATIC DOCUMENTS" belonging to my client (that?s you).Furthermore, the weight of the consignment is 90kg but I manage to pay 45kg, which cost US$9,000.00. On no account should you disclose the content of the crate with the Diplomat= ic Courier Services for fear of betrayal. So do not allow them to know that the content is money. In the meantime, contact the Global Trust Dipomatic Courier Services to the Attn. Edy Smithkline Tel: 44-77-46065722 Email:gtrust11@netscape.net to know the actual situation with the consignment and also give them your= address where the consignment will be delivered and then get back to me as soon as possible so that I can give you the shipment document. Meanwhile, I will be coming over to your country immediately the consignm= ent arrives in your Country for my 10% share. Please update me as you contact the Global Trust Diplomatic Courier Servi= ces for more details you may need from me. Congrats and remain blessed. Best Regards, Yours faithfully, Dr. MIKE BELLO - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Wed Feb 09 17:38:02 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1Cyuqn-0004yT-I3; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:38:01 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:37:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from red.alpha.net.pl ([212.106.140.10]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1Cyuq4-0004xd-KB for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:37:16 +0100 Received: from konto.pl (dnm144.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.24.94.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by red.alpha.net.pl (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j19GhusK025310 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:44:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from aderman@konto.pl) Message-Id: <200502091644.j19GhusK025310@red.alpha.net.pl> From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?QW5kcnplaiBLbGltb3dpY3ogPGFkZXJtYW5Aa29udG8ucGw+?=@red.alpha.net.pl To: =?ISO-8859-2?B?bGludXgtY3J5cHRvQG5sLmxpbnV4Lm9yZw==?=@red.alpha.net.pl Subject: =?ISO-8859-2?B?UFpVIFNBIGkgZGVhbGVyenkgeiBFdXJla28uLi4=?= Date: 09 Feb 2005 17:37:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1107967449-20276-92" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Received-SPF: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: =?ISO-8859-2?B?QW5kcnplaiBLbGltb3dpY3ogPGFkZXJtYW5Aa29udG8ucGw+?=@red.alpha.net.pl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1107967449-20276-92 Content-Type: text/html Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by red.alpha.net.pl id j19GhusK025310


Eureko przeprowadzi=B3o gig= antyczn=B1=20 akcj=EA public relations, kieruj=B1c ogromne =B6rodki na przekonanie dzie= nnikarzy,=20 polityk=F3w, urz=EAdnik=F3w… Sp=F3r arbitra=BFowy mia=B3 by=E6 koro= nnym argumentem w medialnej=20 prezentacji. Eureko i= grupa=20 Banku Millennium zamierza=B3a wykorzysta=E6 post=EApowanie propagandowo i= w zas=B3onie=20 dymnej przej=B1=E6 kontrol=EA nad PZU. Niezaplanowany rozw=F3j wyp= adk=F3w w=20 postaci ujawnienia poufnych przes=B3ucha=F1 kompromituj=B1cych Eureko spo= wodowa=B3=20 ca=B3kiem przeciwny rezultat.
Z nasmarowanego uk=B3adu oliwa zacz=EA=B3a wyp=B3ywa=E6 na powierzchni=EA= …

Prywatyzacja PZU to Golgota prywatyzacji maj=B1tku publicznego w Polsce. = Pr=F3buje=20 si=EA przej=B1=E6 kontrol=EA nad publicznym maj=B1tkiem za u=B3amek warto= =B6ci. Jak 2000 lat=20 temu, tak i teraz jest wielu faryzeuszy i Judaszy. To faryzeusze wydali w= yrok,=20 podobnie jest dzisiaj, pr=F3buj=B1 wskaza=E6 za s=B3uszne to, co im przyn= iesie korzy=B6=E6.

=ACr=F3d=B3o:
Jansen pogr=B1=BFa Eureko  http://pzu.1colony.com

Inne strony:
http://www.wprost.pl/pzu
http://www.geocities.com/r= eadares/
http://pzu.atspace.org


Kliknij=20 by wypisa=E6 si=EA z listy mailingowej.

-- ----------- Opanuj szok ------------- Serwer www 80 MB + bazy MySQL,=20 + dowolna ilosc kont e-mail + panel=20 za 49 PLN rocznie z VAT - www.anv.pl ------------------------------------- ------------=_1107967449-20276-92-- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 10 11:04:19 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzBBI-0003n2-5s; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:04:16 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:03:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp106.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.169.226]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzBAU-0003jF-5W for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:03:26 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO yahoo.dk) (castrolkonto2@192.38.9.236 with plain) by smtp106.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2005 10:01:53 -0000 Message-ID: <420B310F.7030208@yahoo.dk> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:01:51 +0100 From: Petersen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421 X-Accept-Language: da, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Performance and safety of AES256-'multi-key-v3' versus AES128-v1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: castrolkonto2@yahoo.dk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto I made a drive using this setup: offset=8192 encryption=AES256 multi-key-v3 Now, throughput on my rather weak Linux-running pentium 200MHz fell when upgrading from plain v1-AES128. This is not surprising; however multikey-v3 also eats more processing power, am I right? Is AES128 safe enough in your mind Jari; I see you use it in your examples in the README. Downgrading would give me better performance I suppose. - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 10 11:23:38 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzBU1-0000MD-EA; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:23:37 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:23:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp105.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.169.225]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzBTe-0000Lc-IZ for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:23:14 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO yahoo.dk) (castrolkonto2@192.38.9.236 with plain) by smtp105.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2005 10:23:08 -0000 Message-ID: <420B360A.4020002@yahoo.dk> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:23:06 +0100 From: Petersen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421 X-Accept-Language: da, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: loop-AES256 multikey-v3 slows down after hours of hard work Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080300020207020805060801" Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: castrolkonto2@yahoo.dk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080300020207020805060801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit loop-AES256 multikey-v3 slows down after hours of hard work, rsyncing from an AES256-v3 drive to an AES128-v1 drive. Has anyone seen this as well? I add a top-printout, sorry for the control characters. --------------080300020207020805060801 Content-Type: text/plain; name="log_top.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="log_top.txt" top - 22:21:42 up 1 day, 11:28, 1 user, load average: 0.68, 1.54, 1.79 Tasks: 36 total, 1 running, 33 sleeping, 2 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 8.9% us, 33.1% sy, 1.2% ni, 28.3% id, 2.6% wa, 1.3% hi, 24.7% si Mem:  321328k total, 319484k used, 1844k free, 261844k buffers Swap: 196548k total, 0k used, 196548k free, 5172k cached   PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND  14604 root 16 0 2056 932 1844 R 5.6 0.3 0:00.07 top   14 root 16 0 0 0 0 S 1.9 0.0 0:26.89 kjournald   515 nobody 17 0 1736 816 1524 S 1.9 0.3 34:15.75 tcpspy   1 root 16 0 1500 516 1344 S 0.0 0.2 0:10.61 init   2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.43 ksoftirqd/0   3 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:12.63 events/0   4 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.05 khelper   5 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 20:10.44 kblockd/0   7 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 49:03.25 pdflush   9 root 15 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0   8 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 22:53.79 kswapd0   10 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 cifsoplockd   13 root 25 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod   63 root 14 -1 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 2:48.96 loop6   243 daemon 16 0 1608 564 1432 S 0.0 0.2 0:01.65 portmap   333 root 16 0 1504 468 1336 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.12 klogd   343 root 16 0 3868 2772 1700 S 0.0 0.9 1:20.12 ypserv   346 root 20 0 1784 512 1456 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 rpc.yppasswdd   349 root 20 0 1676 564 1436 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 rpc.ypxfrd   357 root 16 0 18296 732 1720 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.01 ypbind   368 root 16 0 5244 2236 3064 S 0.0 0.7 0:53.57 cupsd   445 root 16 0 1688 712 1468 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.65 dhcpd   455 mail 16 0 4432 1500 4064 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.12 exim3   467 root 20 0 1492 428 1336 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 inetd   508 root 16 0 3392 1496 3012 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.11 sshd   519 root 18 0 1672 740 1496 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.02 rpc.statd   522 daemon 16 0 1680 636 1512 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 atd   525 root 16 0 1760 820 1568 S 0.0 0.3 0:04.16 cron   557 root 17 0 1496 480 1328 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 getty   1377 root 14 -1 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 84:14.77 loop0   1379 root 14 -1 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 380:31.42 loop1   1992 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:17.34 pdflush  14553 root 15 0 14360 2004 3104 S 0.0 0.6 0:00.83 sshd  14556 root 15 0 3512 2120 2064 S 0.0 0.7 0:01.04 tcsh  14585 root 16 0 1544 532 1372 T 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 fsck  14586 root 23 0 6476 5516 1572 T 0.0 1.7 2:25.49 fsck.ext2  [?25h[?0c --------------080300020207020805060801-- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 10 11:52:53 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzBwK-0002EK-9H; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:52:52 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:52:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([217.112.240.26]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzBvy-0002DA-Im for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:52:30 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B072D64F9; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:19 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03430-07; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:11 +0200 (EET) Received: from armas (a64.adsl.tnnet.fi [217.112.242.64]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838A62A097A; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:11 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=users.sourceforge.net) by armas with esmtp (Exim) id 1CzBve-0000mo-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:11 +0200 Message-ID: <420B3CDA.33F4E2DC@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:10 +0200 From: Jari Ruusu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.22aa1r8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Petersen Cc: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: Performance and safety of AES256-'multi-key-v3' versus AES128-v1 References: <420B310F.7030208@yahoo.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.tnnet.fi Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Petersen wrote: > I made a drive using this setup: > > offset=8192 encryption=AES256 multi-key-v3 > > Now, throughput on my rather weak Linux-running pentium 200MHz fell when > upgrading from plain v1-AES128. This is not surprising; however > multikey-v3 also eats more processing power, am I right? multikey v2 and v3 eat more processing power than v1. AES256 eats more processing power than AES128. > Is AES128 safe enough in your mind Jari; I see you use it in your > examples in the README. I use AES128 myself. > Downgrading would give me better performance I suppose. Yep. -- Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 10 11:52:57 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzBwN-0002Ez-Qb; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:52:55 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:52:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([217.112.240.26]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzBwA-0002EL-Cl for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:52:42 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CFD2DFA07; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03869-05; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:34 +0200 (EET) Received: from armas (a64.adsl.tnnet.fi [217.112.242.64]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20DD2A097A; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:34 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=users.sourceforge.net) by armas with esmtp (Exim) id 1CzBw2-0000mq-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:34 +0200 Message-ID: <420B3CF2.8C929038@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:52:34 +0200 From: Jari Ruusu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.22aa1r8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Petersen Cc: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: loop-AES256 multikey-v3 slows down after hours of hard work References: <420B360A.4020002@yahoo.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.tnnet.fi Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Petersen wrote: > loop-AES256 multikey-v3 slows down after hours of hard work, rsyncing > from an AES256-v3 drive to an AES128-v1 drive. Has anyone seen this as well? Three loop threads sleeping. Nothing unusual there. But the stopped fsck and fsck.ext2 processes look strange. -- Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 10 12:01:42 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzC4r-00030N-8D; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:01:41 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:01:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp108.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.6]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzC4R-0002ze-BR for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:01:15 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO yahoo.dk) (castrolkonto2@192.38.9.236 with plain) by smtp108.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2005 11:01:08 -0000 Message-ID: <420B3EF2.4010408@yahoo.dk> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:01:06 +0100 From: Petersen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421 X-Accept-Language: da, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jari Ruusu CC: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: Performance and safety of AES256-'multi-key-v3' versus AES128-v1 References: <420B310F.7030208@yahoo.dk> <420B3CDA.33F4E2DC@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <420B3CDA.33F4E2DC@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: castrolkonto2@yahoo.dk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Jari Ruusu wrote: > Petersen wrote: > >>I made a drive using this setup: >> >>offset=8192 encryption=AES256 multi-key-v3 >> >>Now, throughput on my rather weak Linux-running pentium 200MHz fell when >>upgrading from plain v1-AES128. This is not surprising; however >>multikey-v3 also eats more processing power, am I right? > > > multikey v2 and v3 eat more processing power than v1. > AES256 eats more processing power than AES128. > > >>Is AES128 safe enough in your mind Jari; I see you use it in your >>examples in the README. > > > I use AES128 myself. > So that's ? > >>Downgrading would give me better performance I suppose. > > > Yep. > - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Fri Feb 11 01:57:31 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzP7g-0006Qm-RD; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:57:28 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:56:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from ns1.g-housing.de ([62.75.136.201] helo=mail.g-house.de) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CzP6y-0006QF-8j for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:56:44 +0100 Received: from g0590.g.pppool.de ([80.185.5.144] helo=sheep.housecafe.de) by mail.g-house.de with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CzP5M-000604-0x for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:55:04 +0100 Received: from prinz.housecafe.de ([192.168.10.11]) by sheep.housecafe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1CzP6p-00020Q-SD for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:56:35 +0100 Message-ID: <420C02C3.6080002@g-house.de> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:56:35 +0100 From: Christian Kujau User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: Performance and safety of AES256-'multi-key-v3' versus AES128-v1 References: <420B310F.7030208@yahoo.dk> <420B3CDA.33F4E2DC@users.sourceforge.net> <420B3EF2.4010408@yahoo.dk> In-Reply-To: <420B3EF2.4010408@yahoo.dk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: evil@g-house.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Petersen schrieb: >> >> I use AES128 myself. >> > So that's ? there is no "safe" and "unsafe". 256bit AES is "safer than" 128bit AES and ROT-13 is probably "safer than" plaintext-hidden-under-your-chair. consider the importance of your data, the amount of cpu-power (aka "money") of the people trying to get your plaintext and your willingnes to exchange cipher-bits for speed..then you'll get a figure of what you can consider "safe" for your system. i'm using AES128bit too, and Jari "Mr. loop-aes" Ruusu also uses 128bit AES too...it can't be that unsafe, can it? Christian. - -- BOFH excuse #47: Complete Transient Lockout -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCDALD+A7rjkF8z0wRAvvQAJ9Ey/l8P+k4fcEF/L2NoscCY6hZegCgt4NP zEck95PunAuxVBdRxSSb1a0= =xYeT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Mon Feb 14 20:24:24 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D0lpW-0002Jc-D6; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:24:22 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:23:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailout06.infosat.net ([66.18.69.6] helo=mail02.infosat.net) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D0loi-00025F-Bx for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:23:32 +0100 Received: from [196.38.110.29] (HELO mail01.infosat.net) by mail02.infosat.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 202663419; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:22:09 +0200 Received: from [165.146.17.32] (account promoflash2@702mail.co.za) by mail01.infosat.net (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 633452611; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:22:09 +0200 From: "PROMOTERS FLASH" Subject: Claims To: promoflash2@702mail.co.za X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:22:09 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=NIGERIAN_BODY1,NIGERIAN_BODY2, US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: promoflash2@702mail.co.za Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto PROMOTERS FLASH LOTTO ORG, MELVILLE, SOUTH AFRICA NOTIFICATION OF YOUR LOTTO WINNING ATTENTION: we are pleased to inform you Monday 14th Feb, 2005 as one of the lucky winners of the NATIONAL ELECTRONIC LOTTERY INC draws, held on Friday 28th Jan,2005 as part of Our e-business promotional draws. Participants in the draws were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from 2,500,000 e-mail addresses of individuals and companies from Africa, America, Asia, Australia, Canada, Europe, Middle East, and New Zealand as part of our electronic business Promotions Program. You qualified for the draw as a result of you visiting various websites we are running the Electronic-business promotions for. You/Your Company e-mail address, attached with REFERENCE NUMBER: ZAR 23457677/2004 BATCH NUMBER: 79-124-WAN with serial number 818-09 drew the lucky numbers 2-9-22-23-24-30 and consequently won in the second quarter of the 2005 year draw. You have therefore been approved for lump sum pay out of US$2,200,000.00 in cash, which is the winning payout for First category winners. This is from the total prize money of US$15,000,000.00 shared among the seven winners in the First category. CONGRATULATIONS! Your winnings should be claimed from our paying Agents here in South Africa As we have notified them. Due to the mix-up that may arise from emails of winners and numbers we ask that you keep this award strictly from public notice until your claim has been processed and your money remitted to you. This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unscrupulous acts by participants of this program. We hope with a part of your prize, you will participate in our middle of year (2005) high stakes US$1.1 billion International Lottery.To begin your claim, please contact our claims manager in our claims department. MR. JOHN NKOSI CLAIMS MANAGER FOREIGN SERVICE MANAGER MELVILLE, SOUTH AFRICA TEL: +27-73-208-9222. EMIAL: claims@promotersflash.com For due processing and remittance of your prize money, Remember you must contact your claim agent not later than two weeks. All funds will be returned as unclaimed. Congratulations Once Again Thanks Mrs. Suzan De-Klerk Promotions Manager - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Wed Feb 16 08:01:22 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D1JBX-0006zg-Pw; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:01:19 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:00:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from 216-55-181-45.dedicated.abac.net ([216.55.181.45] helo=domain.com) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D1JAd-0006vS-JC for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:00:23 +0100 Received: from 2165518145 ([127.0.0.1]) by domain.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:25:26 -0800 thread-index: AcUTQEhmdmpkucuTSPuXaCO2LKAkUg== Thread-Topic: List Your Company FREE @AllManufacturers.net From: To: Subject: List Your Company FREE @AllManufacturers.net Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:25:26 -0800 Message-ID: <50e201c51340$48665d70$2db537d8@2165518145> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_50E3_01C512FD.3A431D70" X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.181 Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,JOIN_MILLIONS,NO_REAL_NAME, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: advertise@allmanufacturers.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_50E3_01C512FD.3A431D70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable WE TELL THE WORLD WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU DO. Attn. Advertisement Department AllManufacturers.net is giving you a free advertisment oppurtunity in 7+ different Languages, such as English, French, Arabic, Spanish, Romanian, Chinese and German. 100% Free Listing at AllManufacturers.net. It is time to make use of this most powerful free marketing tool. Use AllManufacturers.net's services and advertise on the Internet now for FREE. We are offering your company free advertisement on our web site in seven different Languages!!!. Let us help you put your business on top. Become part of the world=92s fastest growing online search engine and join thousands = who are already present on the Information Super-Highway. Simply Click here AllManufacturers.net to list your company. OR Log on to www.allmanufacturers.net NOTE: Please do not send your company details by email to us, you can simply list through our website. If there is a problem during listin please let us know, Thanks. Yours Online Business Partner AllManufacturers.net AllManufacturers.net =20 IMPORTANT: To unsubscribe, please reply with REMOVE US subject. Thanks ------=_NextPart_000_50E3_01C512FD.3A431D70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1256" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
WE TELL THE WORLD WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU DO.


Attn. Advertisement Department

AllManufacturers.net is giving you a free advertisment oppurtunity in 7+ different Languages, such as English, French, Arabic, Spanish, Romanian, Chinese and German.

100% Free Listing at AllManufacturers.net. It is time to make use of this most powerful free marketing tool. Use AllManufacturers.net's services and advertise on the Internet now for FREE. We are offering your company free advertisement on our web site in seven different Languages!!!. Let us help you put your business on top. Become part of the world’s fastest growing online search engine and join thousands who are already present on the Information Super-Highway.

Simply Click here AllManufacturers.net to list your company. OR Log on to www.allmanufacturers.net

NOTE: Please do not send your company details by email to us, you can simply list through our website. If there is a problem during listin please let us know, Thanks.

Yours Online Business Partner
AllManufacturers.net
AllManufacturers.net


IMPORTANT: To unsubscribe, please reply with REMOVE US subject. Thanks ------=_NextPart_000_50E3_01C512FD.3A431D70-- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 17 04:21:46 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D1cEZ-0007T3-87; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:21:43 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:21:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from squat.net ([195.169.149.197]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D1cDq-0007SH-Ug for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:20:58 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by squat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC6434498 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:20:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from squat.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (squat.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19142-02 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:20:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by squat.net (Postfix, from userid 1010) id 1C45D345F9; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:20:37 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.1 (via feedmail 8 I) To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Assembly optimization for AES256 ? From: intrigeri Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:17:30 +0100 User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20050217032037.1C45D345F9@squat.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 at squat.net Received-SPF: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: intrigeri@squat.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Hello, does the AES assembly optimization code included in loop-AES package is AES128-specific, or if it takes care of AES256 too ? (it might seem obvious it works for both, but I want to be *sure*) Thanks, ciao, -- intrigeri gnupg key @ http://intrigeri.boum.org/intrigeri.asc [ Who wants a world in which the guarantee that we shall not ] [ die of starvation entails the risk of dying of boredom ? ] - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 17 16:53:30 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D1ny4-0005sl-6C; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:53:28 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:52:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([217.112.240.26]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D1nx6-0005rs-Lo for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:52:28 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1282E4D52; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:52:09 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07764-04; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:52:02 +0200 (EET) Received: from armas (a64.adsl.tnnet.fi [217.112.242.64]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB13293EAE; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:52:02 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=users.sourceforge.net) by armas with esmtp (Exim) id 1D1nwf-000183-00; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:52:01 +0200 Message-ID: <4214BDA1.FAF44EB6@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:52:01 +0200 From: Jari Ruusu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.22aa1r8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: intrigeri Cc: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: Assembly optimization for AES256 ? References: <20050217032037.1C45D345F9@squat.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.tnnet.fi Received-SPF: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto intrigeri wrote: > does the AES assembly optimization code included in loop-AES package > is AES128-specific, or if it takes care of AES256 too ? > > (it might seem obvious it works for both, but I want to be *sure*) loop-AES includes optimized assembler implementations of AES128, AES192, AES256 and MD5 algorithms for x86 and amd64 compatible processors. -- Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Sat Feb 19 21:43:36 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2bRu-0000U5-Ij; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:43:34 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:42:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwmail.tickle.com ([206.14.210.87]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2bQV-0000Rj-Pq for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:42:07 +0100 Received: (qmail 9767 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2005 20:41:56 -0000 Received: from ext.tickle.com (HELO ) (129.250.134.112) by 10.1.120.9 with SMTP; 19 Feb 2005 20:41:56 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--nextpart_boundary1108845716897" To: "fook" From: "Tickle/Emode" Subject: Your Tickle/Emode account will soon be deleted Date: 19 Feb 2005 12:41:56 PST Message-Id: Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID,RCVD_BY_IP,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: noreply@tickle-inc.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto ----nextpart_boundary1108845716897 Content-Type: text/plain; fook, We haven't seen you in a while... our records show that you last signed in to Tickle, formerly known as Emode, on October 14, 2003. Because you haven't signed in or taken a test within the past year, your account has been marked as inactive. If it remains inactive for another 30 days, we'll need to delete it. To reactivate your account and save your existing test results, click here: https://secure.tickle.com/reactivate.jsp?id=GBeYhJi8gBaqNRAxgy00 Or, simply sign in to Tickle any time within the next month. Tests Taken The Classic IQ Test Result: Inspired Inventor Date Taken: 10/14/03 If you do nothing, your account will be deleted in 30 days. Your membership information and test results will be permanently erased. If you have any questions about your account, or to contact Customer Service, please visit http://support.tickle.com. This email was sent to linux-crypto@nl.linux.org. Tickle Inc., 222 Sutter St, 5th Flr, San Francisco, CA 94108 ----nextpart_boundary1108845716897 Content-Type: text/html; Your Tickle/Emode account will soon be deleted

fook,

We haven't seen you in a while... our records show that you last signed in to Tickle, formerly known as Emode, on October 14, 2003.

Because you haven't signed in or taken a test within the past year, your account has been marked as inactive. If it remains inactive for another 30 days, we'll need to delete it.

To reactivate your account and save your test results, click here:
https://secure.tickle.com/reactivate.jsp?id=GBeYhJi8gBaqNRAxgy00

Or, simply sign in to Tickle any time within the next month.

Tests Taken
  Test Title   Result   Date Taken
  The Classic IQ Test   Inspired Inventor   10/14/03


If you do nothing, your account will be deleted in 30 days. Your membership information and test results will be permanently erased.

If you have any questions about your account, or to contact Customer Service, please visit http://support.tickle.com.

Note: Emode changed its name to Tickle in October, 2003.



This message was sent to: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org
Tickle Inc., 222 Sutter St, 5th Flr, San Francisco, CA 94108
----nextpart_boundary1108845716897-- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 00:48:17 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2eKc-0007N6-E5; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:48:14 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:47:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2eK2-0007MS-Lg for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:47:38 +0100 Received: (qmail 17797 invoked by uid 0); 19 Feb 2005 23:47:27 -0000 Received: from 217.234.199.153 by www22.gmx.net with HTTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:47:27 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:47:27 +0100 (MET) From: Peter_22@gmx.de To: intrigeri Cc: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20050217032037.1C45D345F9@squat.net> Subject: Re: Assembly optimization for AES256 ? X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #5663700 Message-ID: <27273.1108856847@www22.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: Peter_22@gmx.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto intrigeri wrote: > does the AES assembly optimization code included in loop-AES package > is AES128-specific, or if it takes care of AES256 too ? The optimizations work for AES128 and AES256. When you upgrade from a previous version of loop-aes you will feel the increase of speed and the drop of cpu load while reading/writing from encrypted media. To make use of these features you need an AMD64 CPU and a 64-bit kernel. Even without figures and statistics: It´s impressive and worth trying. Regards, Peter -- Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 18:31:30 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2uvZ-0002Dl-7Q; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:31:29 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:31:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2uuf-000288-MS for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:30:33 +0100 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CwMSg-0001i3-AU for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:30:34 +0100 Received: from pool-141-154-10-148.bos.east.verizon.net ([141.154.10.148]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:30:34 +0100 Received: from wren by pool-141-154-10-148.bos.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:30:34 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org From: "J. Wren Hunt" Subject: Re: Setting up loog-aes in detail Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:07:20 -0500 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <200501101819.31228.jluehr@gmx.net> <41E2CF2E.523844A4@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: wren@hunt.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-141-154-10-148.bos.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <41E2CF2E.523844A4@users.sourceforge.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner-SpamScore: sss X-MailScanner-From: glc-linux-crypto@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: wren@cacert.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jari Ruusu wrote: | |>Every example I see in the docs uses AES128. Is there a reason not to use |>AES256? (Of cource AES-128 will be secure for some time, but this is a reason |>pro aes-128 and not against aes-256, because AES-256 is also for some time ;) | | | AES128 is a little bit faster than AES256 | Does anyone happen to have any data illustrating roughly what the speed differences are? Looking for graphs without having to do the analysis myself if I can help it! :-) Wren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCAOynA/qR4Uok1vQRAqQjAKD6Mib1y+Aw0K/M5GxqpzM1QS1rTACgukwc yMQwCgyjL6nkgpbL+jPKisM= =7Zi5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 18:58:11 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2vLO-0006zP-AO; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:58:10 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:58:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([217.112.240.26]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2vL2-0006xs-OA for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:57:48 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97472E921E; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:57:44 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.tnnet.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29395-02; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:57:38 +0200 (EET) Received: from armas (a64.adsl.tnnet.fi [217.112.242.64]) by mail.tnnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CA92E505F; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:57:38 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=users.sourceforge.net) by armas with esmtp (Exim) id 1D2vKr-0000sW-00; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:57:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4218CF91.A3A7B2BC@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:57:37 +0200 From: Jari Ruusu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.22aa1r8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wren@hunt.org Cc: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: Setting up loog-aes in detail References: <200501101819.31228.jluehr@gmx.net> <41E2CF2E.523844A4@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.tnnet.fi Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto "J. Wren Hunt" wrote: > Does anyone happen to have any data illustrating roughly what the speed > differences are? Looking for graphs without having to do the analysis > myself if I can help it! :-) Pentium-2 300 MHz, gcc-2.95.4 C language AES implementation key length 128 bits, encrypt speed 84.2 Mbits/s key length 128 bits, decrypt speed 86.4 Mbits/s key length 192 bits, encrypt speed 71.0 Mbits/s key length 192 bits, decrypt speed 73.1 Mbits/s key length 256 bits, encrypt speed 61.0 Mbits/s key length 256 bits, decrypt speed 63.1 Mbits/s Optimized assembler AES implementation key length 128 bits, encrypt speed 134.3 Mbits/s key length 128 bits, decrypt speed 134.9 Mbits/s key length 192 bits, encrypt speed 113.7 Mbits/s key length 192 bits, decrypt speed 114.2 Mbits/s key length 256 bits, encrypt speed 98.3 Mbits/s key length 256 bits, decrypt speed 99.5 Mbits/s AMD Opteron 1593.7 MHz, gcc-3.2.2 C language AES implementation key length 128 bits, encrypt speed 690.0 Mbits/s key length 128 bits, decrypt speed 711.8 Mbits/s key length 192 bits, encrypt speed 588.3 Mbits/s key length 192 bits, decrypt speed 607.4 Mbits/s key length 256 bits, encrypt speed 507.7 Mbits/s key length 256 bits, decrypt speed 527.0 Mbits/s Optimized assembler AES implementation key length 128 bits, encrypt speed 1106.6 Mbits/s key length 128 bits, decrypt speed 1107.0 Mbits/s key length 192 bits, encrypt speed 932.3 Mbits/s key length 192 bits, decrypt speed 933.3 Mbits/s key length 256 bits, encrypt speed 807.8 Mbits/s key length 256 bits, decrypt speed 813.7 Mbits/s -- Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 19:35:32 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2vvX-0006Gr-Dh; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:35:31 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:35:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from express.mail.tickle.com ([130.94.6.235] helo=express2.tickle.com) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D2vuu-0006CK-A1 for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:34:52 +0100 Received: from w53.tickle.com (ext.tickle.com [129.250.134.112]) by express2.tickle.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A9AB2342E8 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:33:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--nextpart_boundary1108924407783" To: "fook" From: "Tickle/Emode" Subject: Your Tickle account has been reactivated Date: 20 Feb 2005 10:33:27 PST Message-Id: <20050220183327.A9AB2342E8@express2.tickle.com> Received-SPF: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: noreply@tickle-inc.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto ----nextpart_boundary1108924407783 Content-Type: text/plain; Welcome back, fook! Your Tickle account has been reactivated. Check out all the newest features and tests on Tickle now! NEW! Tickle Matchmaking Test your compatibility with millions of members Flirt with free Icebreaker emails See how many people have browsed you http://web.tickle.com/match/ NEW! Tickle Networking Want to make new friends? Find old friends? Get a job? Search for free and get connected. http://connect.tickle.com NEW! Tickle Tests Tickle's Original Inkblot Test http://web.tickle.com/jumpto?test=inkblotogt The Super IQ http://web.tickle.com/jumpto?test=superiqogt The Zodiac Match Test http://web.tickle.com/jumpto?test=zodiacogt The Career Interest Inventory http://web.tickle.com/jumpto?test=jobinterestsogt This message was sent to: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Tickle Inc., 222 Sutter St, 5th Flr, San Francisco, CA 94108 ----nextpart_boundary1108924407783 Content-Type: text/html; Your Tickle account has been reactivated

Welcome back, fook!

Your Tickle account has been reactivated.
Check out all the newest features and tests on Tickle now!

NEW! Tickle Matchmaking
Test your compatibility with millions of members
Flirt with free Icebreaker emails
See how many people have browsed you


NEW! Tickle Networking
Want to make new friends? Find old friends? Get a job?
Search for free and get connected.


NEW! Tickle Tests
Tickle's Original Inkblot Test
The Super IQ
The Zodiac Match Test
The Career Interest Inventory



 This message was sent to: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org
Tickle Inc., 222 Sutter St, 5th Flr, San Francisco, CA 94108
----nextpart_boundary1108924407783-- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Mon Feb 21 03:35:19 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D33Pm-0001a0-QL; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:35:14 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:34:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from sasami.anime.net ([207.109.251.120]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D33PB-0001ZS-8r for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:34:37 +0100 Received: from localhost (goemon@localhost) by sasami.anime.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1L2YRx31651 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:34:28 -0800 X-Antispam-Origin-Id: c4dc35da7d5d290438c6d6bdb17308d1 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:34:27 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Hollis To: fook Subject: Re: Your Tickle account has been reactivated In-Reply-To: <20050220183327.A9AB2342E8@express2.tickle.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.3.8 (sasami.anime.net [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: goemon@anime.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto On 20 Feb 2005, Tickle/Emode wrote: > Welcome back, fook! > Your Tickle account has been reactivated. uh huh. right. list admin please block *@tickle-inc.com from the list? -Dan - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Mon Feb 21 21:46:40 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3KRy-0002zG-Na; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:46:38 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:46:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.194]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3KN0-0002QF-8U for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:41:30 +0100 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1054860wri for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:41:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hBB1fpRLII6wxCfIWbthM45sfsKqGmpCeUWpl8z2xph72dF6X0/bqRvNKXAT64A3I27BDSQrEKi+7GJMifx34YHax1OzgnwfXUHPMI9FJNQAS6QI7hioOSg5HHpTN7858JH3MihWJpxCkrlHJxzMoB6IlEV+3pjj0burIB6+fQQ= Received: by 10.54.26.43 with SMTP id 43mr239237wrz; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:41:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.33.35 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:41:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5a05b64e0502211241593c84a7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:41:18 -0300 From: Rodrigo Baroni Reply-To: Rodrigo Baroni To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: loop-AES-v3.0b: make tests error Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80,RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: rodrigobaroni@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Hi all,=20 I'm trying to configure my linux box to use the loop-aes. When I run "make tests" after compile (make clean, make) and get the loop-aes-utils debian package (that have the already packed mount, losetup.. - btw, this available package could be informed into the next loop-AES.README) the following error happens: gn:u/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b#make tests [...] /sbin/losetup -d /dev/loop7 echo 12345678901234567890 | /sbin/losetup -p 0 -e AES128 -H sha256 -C 0 -K gpgkey3.asc -G test-dir1 /dev/loop7 test-file1 dd if=3D/dev/loop7 of=3Dtest-file4 bs=3D33792 count=3D1 1+0 registros de entrada 1+0 registros de sa=EDda 33792 bytes transferred in 0,007797 seconds (4334010 bytes/sec) /sbin/losetup -d /dev/loop7 md5sum test-file1 >test-file2 echo "fabe7422f534820838dfd4571ba14ade test-file1" | cmp test-file2 - test-file2 - differ: byte 1, line 1 make[1]: ** [test-part2] Erro 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b' make: ** [tests] Erro 2 gnu:/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b#=20 I've googled but none error like these seems happened before. Does anybody have some idea about what can being happening? The kernel version is 2.6.10, GNU/Linux Debian testing machine. Thanks in advance, Rodrigo Ferreira Baroni - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Mon Feb 21 22:24:35 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3L2g-0002dd-6t; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:24:34 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:24:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from p54bcc389.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.188.195.137] helo=wolfden.dnsalias.net) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3L2H-0002dA-5O for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:24:09 +0100 Received: from furrywolf by wolfden.dnsalias.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D3L2B-0001xf-IF; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:24:03 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:24:03 +0100 From: Mike Dornberger To: Rodrigo Baroni Cc: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: loop-AES-v3.0b: make tests error Message-ID: <20050221212403.GA7534@wolfden.dnsalias.net> Mail-Followup-To: Rodrigo Baroni , linux-crypto@nl.linux.org References: <5a05b64e0502211241593c84a7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <5a05b64e0502211241593c84a7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: Mike.Dornberger@gmx.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Hi, On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 05:41:18PM -0300, Rodrigo Baroni wrote: > I'm trying to configure my linux box to use the loop-aes. When I > run "make tests" after compile (make clean, make) and get the > loop-aes-utils debian package (that have the already packed mount, ^^^^^^ > losetup.. - btw, this available package could be informed into the > next loop-AES.README) the following error happens: >=20 > gn:u/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b#make tests > [...] > /sbin/losetup -d /dev/loop7 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > echo 12345678901234567890 | /sbin/losetup -p 0 -e AES128 -H sha256 -C > 0 -K gpgkey3.asc -G test-dir1 /dev/loop7 test-file1 > dd if=3D/dev/loop7 of=3Dtest-file4 bs=3D33792 count=3D1 > 1+0 registros de entrada > 1+0 registros de sa=EDda > 33792 bytes transferred in 0,007797 seconds (4334010 bytes/sec) > /sbin/losetup -d /dev/loop7 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > md5sum test-file1 >test-file2 > echo "fabe7422f534820838dfd4571ba14ade test-file1" | cmp test-file2 - > test-file2 - differ: byte 1, line 1 > make[1]: ** [test-part2] Erro 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b' > make: ** [tests] Erro 2 > gnu:/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b#=20 >=20 > I've googled but none error like these seems happened before. > Does anybody have some idea about what can being happening? The kernel > version is 2.6.10, GNU/Linux Debian testing machine. if I understand this right, you have just made a Debian package of loop-aes-{modules,utils} and run the test before installing the new package= s? The test uses an older, patched (?) version of losetup and/or loop-aes module. That might be the reason, why it fails. BTW: Is loop-aes prepared to be torn into a deb upstream? (Jari?) If not, I'd be interested, where you got it from, Rodrigo, since according to http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=3Dloop-aes&s= earchon=3Dnames&subword=3D1&version=3Dall&release=3Dall there's only loop-aes 2.2d in testing/unstable at the time of writing. Greetings, Mike - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Tue Feb 22 02:04:45 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3OTj-0003pD-F6; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:04:43 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:04:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.193]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3OSo-000389-OT for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:03:46 +0100 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1095582wri for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:03:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=AkdABZ2pZPV5K/5tT5iaYdNxD6UvDz+ouzcVWBgqQz7yHS8ZKNFEBV64+Q/ikrKRQ6Cg3kuzFfETcrzBnGAHs25sIeObpvpSAYmqeG+oMT3dv9dMUllg5NARIkCDtf7mF89RoHxKS9CWgxHP9H2htWu5QrnC3OEvg3EmlbpNfzY= Received: by 10.54.10.67 with SMTP id 67mr74899wrj; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:03:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.33.35 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:03:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5a05b64e050221170372b0a307@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:03:32 -0300 From: Rodrigo Baroni Reply-To: Rodrigo Baroni To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: loop-AES-v3.0b: make tests error In-Reply-To: <20050221212403.GA7534@wolfden.dnsalias.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <5a05b64e0502211241593c84a7@mail.gmail.com> <20050221212403.GA7534@wolfden.dnsalias.net> Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_95,RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: rodrigobaroni@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:24:03 +0100, Mike Dornberger wrote: Hi Mike,=20 > if I understand this right, you have just made a Debian package of > loop-aes-{modules,utils} and run the test before installing the new packa= ges? > The test uses an older, patched (?) version of losetup and/or loop-aes > module. That might be the reason, why it fails. Thanks for you reply. Sorry If I was not very clear, I'll try explain better now: 1) I've got the last-kernel-stable 2.6.10, configured it as described in the README: (from my .config) and rebooted with it CONFIG_MODULES=3Dy # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP is not set CONFIG_KMOD=3Dy # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP is not set 2) I've got the mount/losetup aes-patched version by bash$ apt-get install loop-aes-utils =20 3) I've downloaded the loop-aes and installed it: bash$ wget -c "http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/loop-AES/loop-AES-v3.0b.tar.= bz2" bash# tar xjvf loop-AES-v3.0b.tar.bz2; cd loop-AES-v3.0b; make clean; make [as root user] 4) I've tested it bash# make tests [as root user] .. as so got that error (with some more lines now): [...] make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b' make test-part2 CT=3DAES128 ITER=3D0 HF=3Dsha256 GK=3D"-K gpgkey3.asc -G test-dir1" MD=3Dfabe7422f534820838dfd4571ba14ade TF=3Dtest-file1 PSW=3D12345678901234567890 make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b' echo 12345678901234567890 | /sbin/losetup -p 0 -e AES128 -H sha256 -C 0 -K gpgkey3.asc -G test-dir1 /dev/loop7 test-file1 dd if=3Dtest-file3 of=3D/dev/loop7 bs=3D1024 count=3D33 conv=3Dnotrunc 33+0 registros de entrada 33+0 registros de sa=EDda 33792 bytes transferred in 0,009038 seconds (3738900 bytes/sec) /sbin/losetup -d /dev/loop7 echo 12345678901234567890 | /sbin/losetup -p 0 -e AES128 -H sha256 -C 0 -K gpgkey3.asc -G test-dir1 /dev/loop7 test-file1 dd if=3D/dev/loop7 of=3Dtest-file4 bs=3D33792 count=3D1 1+0 registros de entrada 1+0 registros de sa=EDda 33792 bytes transferred in 0,007791 seconds (4337247 bytes/sec) /sbin/losetup -d /dev/loop7 md5sum test-file1 >test-file2 echo "fabe7422f534820838dfd4571ba14ade test-file1" | cmp test-file2 - test-file2 - differ: byte 1, line 1 make[1]: ** [test-part2] Erro 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b' make: ** [tests] Erro 2 gnu:/usr/src/loop-aes/loop-AES-v3.0b# I don't know what can being happened. So, I've did all in this order (as you asked). > BTW: Is loop-aes prepared to be torn into a deb upstream? (Jari?) If not, > I'd be interested, where you got it from, Rodrigo I'm getting the loop-aes-utils from the testing version, as show: baroni@gnu:~$ apt-show-versions loop-aes-utils=20 loop-aes-utils/testing uptodate 2.12a-3 baroni@gnu:~$ From the oficial mirror, as show: baroni@gnu:~$ LC_ALL=3DC apt-cache policy loop-aes-utils=20 loop-aes-utils: Installed: 2.12a-3 Candidate: 2.12a-3 Version Table: 2.12p-2 0 800 http://ftp.br.debian.org unstable/main Packages 800 http://ddtp.debian.org pt_BR/sid/main Packages *** 2.12a-3 0 900 http://ftp.br.debian.org testing/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status baroni@gnu:~$ And the info about this package: baroni@gnu:~$ apt-cache show loop-aes-utils=20 Package: loop-aes-utils Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 240 Maintainer: Max Vozeler Architecture: i386 Version: 2.12p-2 Depends: libblkid1, libc6 (>=3D 2.3.2.ds1-4), libuuid1, mount (>=3D 2.12p-1= ) Filename: pool/main/l/loop-aes-utils/loop-aes-utils_2.12p-2_i386.deb Size: 119858 MD5sum: 5e245c84fb65f8aa1d4ec8157b137677 Description: Tools for mounting and manipulating filesystems This package provides the mount(8), umount(8), swapon(8), swapoff(8), and losetup(8) commands with support for loop-AES loopback encryption. . Purpose of this package is to provide users of loop-AES with extended mount support that is not available with the crypto patch in the 'mount' package. . On installation, this package diverts files from the mount package and installs versions with loop-AES support in their places. The diversions get removed on removal of the package. . This package is based on loop-AES 3.0a, util-linux 2.12p-2. Package: loop-aes-utils Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 240 Maintainer: Max Vozeler Architecture: i386 Version: 2.12a-3 Depends: libc6 (>=3D 2.3.2.ds1-4) Filename: pool/main/l/loop-aes-utils/loop-aes-utils_2.12a-3_i386.deb Size: 116154 MD5sum: cbc34545664077c47b47adfa6da10427 Description: Tools for mounting and manipulating encrypted filesystems This package provides the mount(8), umount(8), swapon(8), swapoff(8), and losetup(8) commands from util-linux. They are patched to support the loop-AES encrypted loopback kernel driver. baroni@gnu:~$ =20 Any ideas about what can being happenig? In time, does the key scrubbing feature offers some overhead that slow down the encription/decription time? Thanks in advance, Rodrigo Ferreira Baroni - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Tue Feb 22 02:31:49 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3Otv-00013d-TB; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:31:47 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:31:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.200]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3OtZ-00012v-UW for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:31:26 +0100 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1099591wri for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:31:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=fyRmGEgNIZqadshYN3dkT8BKc538OMVYPxnI9vDjXtEQFTVtIizNN3ybiryqBCIvIQ/TDwL5kK7QqKqp2kbYkVm76ttaSOwDeBOJHJKtT4YVmlDYwv9G01nzZGSqEdM+/aOF9IcyzCuHnrp/wQ5GSaLs0L9d2WRE6B4dUl9dVR4= Received: by 10.54.51.55 with SMTP id y55mr75011wry; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:31:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.33.35 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:31:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5a05b64e0502211731401ff796@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:31:14 -0300 From: Rodrigo Baroni Reply-To: Rodrigo Baroni To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: [SOLUTION!]Re: loop-AES-v3.0b: make tests error In-Reply-To: <5a05b64e050221170372b0a307@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <5a05b64e0502211241593c84a7@mail.gmail.com> <20050221212403.GA7534@wolfden.dnsalias.net> <5a05b64e050221170372b0a307@mail.gmail.com> Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: rodrigobaroni@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto Hi all! I've got resolve the problem and get the so expected message "*** Test results ok ***" ! :) I've installed the last loop-aes-utils and get the problem resolved: bash# apt-get install -t unstable loop-aes-utils bash# apt-show-versions loop-aes-utils loop-aes-utils/unstable uptodate 2.12p-2 Before was installed the testing version: > baroni@gnu:~$ apt-show-versions loop-aes-utils > loop-aes-utils/testing uptodate 2.12a-3 > baroni@gnu:~$ So Jari, consider apply in the README, adding the "apt-get install -t loop-aes-utils" to debian users to the last version of the loop-aes (loop-AES-v3.0b) instead of patching the mount, losetup,.. commands. The 'make tests' show that is ok. Btw, I'll be running an whole system very soon using that package with the loop-AES-v3.0b and report any error/warning message to the list. If that not comes, assume that everything is running sweet :) Thanks Jari for the contribuition to the free-softaware. Rodrigo Ferreira Baroni - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Tue Feb 22 08:45:44 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3Ujg-00057c-IX; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:45:36 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:44:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from server133-han.de-nserver.de ([81.3.17.173]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3Uir-00056f-Mp for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:44:45 +0100 Received: (qmail 13125 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 07:44:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO organic.homeip.net) (test@bitfalle.org@80.146.111.205) by server133-han.de-nserver.de with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 07:44:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by organic.homeip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED0D980A3 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:44:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from organic.homeip.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hoth [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00576-03 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:44:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from tatooine.rebelbase.local (tatooine.rebelbase.local [192.168.0.26]) by organic.homeip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7797980A2 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:44:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from tatooine.rebelbase.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tatooine.rebelbase.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21C71682A9 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:44:20 +0100 (CET) Received: (from chef@localhost) by tatooine.rebelbase.local (8.13.1/8.12.10/Submit) id j1M7iKgd002388 for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:44:20 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: tatooine.rebelbase.local: chef set sender to ml@bitfalle.org using -f Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:44:20 +0100 From: markus reichelt To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: [SOLUTION!]Re: loop-AES-v3.0b: make tests error Message-ID: <20050222074420.GA2135@dantooine> Mail-Followup-To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org References: <5a05b64e0502211241593c84a7@mail.gmail.com> <20050221212403.GA7534@wolfden.dnsalias.net> <5a05b64e050221170372b0a307@mail.gmail.com> <5a05b64e0502211731401ff796@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a05b64e0502211731401ff796@mail.gmail.com> Organization: still stuck in reorganization mode X-PGP-Key: 0xC2A3FEE4 X-PGP-Fingerprint: FFB8 E22F D2BC 0488 3D56 F672 2CCC 933B C2A3 FEE4 X-Request-PGP: http://bitfalle.org/keys/c2a3fee4.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rebelbase.local Received-SPF: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: ml@bitfalle.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rodrigo Baroni wrote: > So Jari, consider apply in the README, adding the "apt-get install > -t loop-aes-utils" to debian users to the last version of the this isn't the first time for errors to occur during setup because of some incompatible packages... you debian users hold the high-score tho ;-) one should prefer cooking one's own install and not use apt-get for this. in general, relying on packages made by others when it comes to security stuff isn't very smart. - -- Bastard Administrator in $hell -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCGuLULMyTO8Kj/uQRAuPJAJ4xxFSEa0IiaKopeEG8dzyre/hFwwCfSvir 0R3mrcEBihLpeTlMWylHm3g= =XkY3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Tue Feb 22 10:45:17 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3WbP-00008K-6y; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:45:11 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:44:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from blaster.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.163.7]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3Wap-00007O-Mq for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:44:35 +0100 Received: from nova (81-178-119-193.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.119.193]) by blaster.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B83E00023A for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:44:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paul by nova with local id 1D3Wab-0006m7-Ht for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:44:21 +0000 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:44:21 +0000 From: Paul Walker To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: [SOLUTION!]Re: loop-AES-v3.0b: make tests error Message-ID: <20050222094420.GG12243@black-sun.demon.co.uk> References: <5a05b64e0502211241593c84a7@mail.gmail.com> <20050221212403.GA7534@wolfden.dnsalias.net> <5a05b64e050221170372b0a307@mail.gmail.com> <5a05b64e0502211731401ff796@mail.gmail.com> <20050222074420.GA2135@dantooine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050222074420.GA2135@dantooine> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Received-SPF: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on humbolt.nl.linux.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Errors-to: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org X-original-sender: paul@black-sun.demon.co.uk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-crypto --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 08:44:20AM +0100, markus reichelt wrote: > this. in general, relying on packages made by others when it comes to > security stuff isn't very smart. Given that you rely on the packages for everything else, I don't see it makes much real difference. --=20 Paul At an Optometrist's Office: "If you don't see what you're looking for you've come to the right place." --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCGv70P9fOqdxRstoRArzhAKCWh61SyMZMGa85tZklfQpIKYL+fgCfSCLq 90Kn6WuPsQUCp8oGsG2Ezek= =iDfe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk-- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/ From linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org Tue Feb 22 17:56:06 2005 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=humbolt) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3dKJ-0006lg-HQ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:55:59 +0100 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-crypto); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:55:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from server133-han.de-nserver.de ([81.3.17.173]) by humbolt.nl.linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1D3dJW-0006k6-Pw for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:55:11 +0100 Received: (qmail 27993 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 16:54:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO organic.homeip.net) (test@bitfalle.org@217.95.147.51) by server133-han.de-nserver.de with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 16:54:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by organic.homeip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDD6980A5 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:54:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from organic.homeip.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hoth [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00576-04 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:54:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from tatooine.rebelbase.local (tatooine.rebelbase.local [192.168.0.26]) by organic.homeip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB67A980A4 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:54:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from tatooine.rebelbase.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tatooine.rebelbase.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119A61682A9 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:54:34 +0100 (CET) Received: (from chef@localhost) by tatooine.rebelbase.local (8.13.1/8.12.10/Submit) id j1MGsWnW002465 for linux-crypto@nl.linux.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:54:32 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: tatooine.rebelbase.local: chef set sender to ml@bitfalle.org using -f Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:54:32 +0100 From: markus reichelt To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: [SOLUTION!]Re: loop-AES-v3.0b: make tests error Message-ID: <20050222165432.GA2117@dantooine> Mail-Followup-To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org References: <5a05b64e0502211241593c84a7@mail.gmail.com> <20050221212403.GA7534@wolfden.dnsalias.net> <5a05b64e050221170372b0a307@mail.gmail.com> <5a05b64e0502211731401ff796@mail.gmail.com> <20050222074420.GA2135@dantooine> <20050222094420.GG12243@black-sun.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050222094420.GG12243@black-sun.demon.co.uk> Organization: still stuck in reorganization mode X-PGP-Key: 0xC2A3FEE4 X-PGP-Fingerprint: FFB8 E22F D2BC 0488 3D56 F672 2CCC 933B C2A3 FEE4 X-Request-PGP: http://bitfalle.org/keys/c2a3fee4.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rebelbase.local Received-SPF: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) o