* Phil H <philtickle200@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is there any easy way to tell if iteration actually > has been "slowed down by 128 times" ie that the > patched gpgp is working as it should? you could try running nasty, http://www.vanheusden.com/nasty/ with a patched gpg, there're only about 200 keys/sec tested on a P-M @ 1,6GHz There seems to be an issue with parameters about password length; one can specify min/max length on the command line, but for me this doesn't work. the author was informed about this. -- Bastard Administrator in $hell
Attachment:
pgp00004.pgp
Description: PGP signature