[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

aespipe - pros and con

To: linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: aespipe - pros and con
From: Phil H <philtickle200@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EIn0d3z7ghqXV+/HiL98Upvp92JrSSNhsdtVlDGlYclQrvHc3m0EFm+6FbtTabr45w0JvLAXiVUdgSPDiCzpt9bHmixKC/m8LfYN5HjM+wKA2GeIc/JCxWuoPHOyQdQrXjHkW1reLkCKEYIyMnOW0RgxcZrC9ZxTJsksvI78wbY= ;
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-id: <linux-crypto.nl.linux.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ecartis-owner@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-crypto@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:linux-crypto-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-crypto-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I note that aespipe can encrypt a filesystem giving a
similar result to loop-aes (3.4 Example 4 from the
README). Compiling aespipe also doesn't require a
kernel rebuild (even I can do it!).

Why then continue to develop or use loop-aes? (Speed? Security?)


		
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch.html

-
Linux-crypto:  cryptography in and on the Linux system
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: aespipe - pros and con
  - From: markus reichelt
- Re: aespipe - pros and con
  - From: Toby

Prev by Date: Re: problems with make for loop-aes under suse 9.3
Next by Date: Re: aespipe - pros and con
Previous by thread: Re: problems with make for loop-aes under suse 9.3
Next by thread: Re: aespipe - pros and con
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread