[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Stable release

To: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org
Subject: Stable release
From: "W. Michael Petullo" <mike@flyn.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:37:38 +0200
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/>
List-help: <mailto:listar@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-owner: <mailto:riel@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-crypto@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Listar version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:linux-crypto-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-crypto-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-crypto-archive@nl.linux.org
Sender: linux-crypto-bounce@nl.linux.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

Man, do I love this pam_mount/encrypted home directories thing!  How far
away is patch-int-2.4.x and the util-linux patch away from being
considered stable?

Quite some time ago I had some data on an encrypted filesystem get
corrupted.  I had backups, but I'd like to hear some opinions about when
this stuff should be used on production systems.

Thank you.

-- 
Mike

:wq
-
Linux-crypto:  cryptography in and on the Linux system
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/

Prev by Date: Re: How to find out what kernel module was used for encryption ?
Next by Date: machine tool
Prev by thread: Re: How to find out what kernel module was used for encryption ?
Next by thread: machine tool
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread