Re: the "cluster" system call (and file system type)

[Jordi Polo <mumismo@wanadoo.es>]

> I think what people hate is polluting /proc in separate subtrees, like
> putting things in /proc/sys/net/cluster, /proc/cpu/cluster, etc.
> I thing thigs can be done in an transparent way defining a fake clusterfs,
> with things like cluter_add_entry etc. that (by now) just call they
> equivalents in proc_xxx, rooted at /proc/cluster. If sometine you have to
> move the tree, well, just clone the proc_xxx functions to a new independent
> tree.

As far as i can see you are going to do a /proc-like fs outside /proc so as 
david want the same but in /proc i think that we can begin to think in what 
will be inside that directory and later we can put it in /proc or /cluster or 
whatever. 
We are just discussing the minor thing we'll have to decide, when we have all 
we want to be inside that directory we can just ask linus where he wants it. 
Maybe is just a matter of taste :P 

Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/