[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cluster vs. grid

To: linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: cluster vs. grid
From: Greg Lindahl <lindahl@conservativecomputer.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:33:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3B4E356F.72005037@cstp.umkc.edu>; from dnicol@cstp.umkc.edu on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:40:31PM -0500
Mail-Followup-To: linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
References: <20010712102050.W25392@figure1.int.wirex.com> <20010712112342.X25392@figure1.int.wirex.com> <20010713000745.A30317@werewolf.able.es> <01071300385805.02292@mioooldpc> <20010713011745.C30345@werewolf.able.es> <3B4E356F.72005037@cstp.umkc.edu>
Sender: owner-linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:40:31PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:

> Maybe we should start calling it a "grid" instead of a cluster :)

Grids and clusters are different things. If you want to build grids,
go build grids.

g

Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cluster vs. grid
  - From: "David L. Nicol" <david@kasey.umkc.edu>

References:
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com>
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com>
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: Jordi Polo <mumismo@wanadoo.es>
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
- cluster vs. grid
  - From: "David L. Nicol" <dnicol@cstp.umkc.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Clusterwide pids
Next by Date: Re: Clusterwide pids
Prev by thread: cluster vs. grid
Next by thread: Re: cluster vs. grid
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread