[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clusterwide pids

To: linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: Clusterwide pids
From: Greg Lindahl <lindahl@conservativecomputer.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 02:02:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <039701c109cc$4c104e80$28627dc7@filesrus>; from billtodd@foo.mv.com on Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 01:42:38AM -0400
Mail-Followup-To: linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
References: <20010710163106.LSM13530.imf06bis.bellsouth.net@taz> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107102342330.12297-100000@hermes.orcero.org> <20010711002940.A1264@werewolf.able.es> <039701c109cc$4c104e80$28627dc7@filesrus>
Sender: owner-linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 01:42:38AM -0400, Bill Todd wrote:

> Not being at all Linux-savvy, I'll just mention that if the PID size may be
> changing anyway taking it all the way to 64 bits might avoid another change
> later.

This is a good example of a point which is pointless to bring up on
this mailing list. But you can read the linux-kernel list to find out
what's actually already in the plans for the main kernel.

g

Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/

References:
- Clusterwide pids
  - From: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@NorcrossGroup.com>
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: <irbis@orcero.org>
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: "Bill Todd" <billtodd@foo.mv.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Clusterwide pids
Next by Date: Re: Clusterwide pids
Prev by thread: Re: Clusterwide pids
Next by thread: Re: Clusterwide pids
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread