[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clusterwide pids

To: Bruce Walker <bruce@kahuna.cag.cpqcorp.net>
Subject: Re: Clusterwide pids
From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 01:42:43 +0200
Cc: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>, irbis@orcero.org,Greg Freemyer <freemyer@NorcrossGroup.com>,linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
In-Reply-To: <200107102329.f6ANTgo08480@kahuna.cag.cpqcorp.net>; from bruce@kahuna.cag.cpqcorp.net on Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 01:29:42 +0200
References: <20010711002940.A1264@werewolf.able.es> <200107102329.f6ANTgo08480@kahuna.cag.cpqcorp.net>
Sender: owner-linux-cluster@nl.linux.org


On 20010711 Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>Given a scheme to determine the node number early in boot, I would suggest
>that 0 be the default (no clustering; not a valid node number) and
>you assign a node number if you intend to cluster at some point.  Clearly
>we don't want to hard code the node number into the kernel.
>> 

Could it be done like DCHP ? So if you wanto to re-define nodes just have to
change a main server config. On boot, nodes ask for a number. And you can
force a node to re-new its number.
mmm, yes, just like pump -R.

-- 
J.A. Magallon                           #  Let the source be with you...        
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.6-ac2 #1 SMP Sun Jul 8 23:57:11 CEST 2001 i686

Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/

References:
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
- Re: Clusterwide pids
  - From: Bruce Walker <bruce@kahuna.cag.cpqcorp.net>

Prev by Date: re[2]: Clusterwide pids
Next by Date: Re: Clusterwide pids
Prev by thread: Re: Clusterwide pids
Next by thread: Re: Clusterwide pids
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread