[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework

To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Subject: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
From: <irbis@orcero.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:59:57 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
cc: linux-cluster <linux-cluster@nl.linux.org>
In-Reply-To: <012a01c0ede8$b7958940$2d627dc7@filesrus>
Sender: owner-linux-cluster@nl.linux.org



 Hello, all!

> > we need to be over this kind of issue.  I don't believe the bandwidth
> > utilization is particularly relevant anymore
>
> While bandwidth may be less relevant (though it's seldom *completely*
> irrelevant),

 But bandwidth IS relevant to some of us. There is some people doing HP
clustering with cheap hardware -that in some countries it is not SO
cheap-.


 Yours:

David

---------------------
http://www.orcero.org
  irbis@orcero.org
---------------------


Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
  - From: Alan Robertson <alanr@unix.sh>

References:
- Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
  - From: "Bill Todd" <billtodd@foo.mv.com>

Prev by Date: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
Next by Date: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
Prev by thread: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
Next by thread: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread