[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework

To: linux-cluster <linux-cluster@nl.linux.org>
Subject: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
From: Greg Lindahl <lindahl@conservativecomputer.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:44:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <011b01c0ede5$d92be480$2d627dc7@filesrus>; from billtodd@foo.mv.com on Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 01:34:59PM -0400
Mail-Followup-To: linux-cluster <linux-cluster@nl.linux.org>
References: <D22AB62C940AD511BD000090271F3FE84B3A0C-100000@ausxmbt101.us.dell.com> <3B1CFF44.64F9DFA7@unix.sh> <011b01c0ede5$d92be480$2d627dc7@filesrus>
Sender: owner-linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 01:34:59PM -0400, Bill Todd wrote:

> An aspect that I haven't yet seen covered (though I might have missed it) is
> the efficient processing of large chunks of data - e.g., file/database pages
> (which these days can easily reach 128 KB in size

Gee, I didn't realize we were building such a general purpose
protocol just to handle our cluster control messages. I'm sure we'll
end up with something as elegant as Mach when we're done.

-- g

Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
  - From: "Bill Todd" <billtodd@foo.mv.com>

References:
- Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
  - From: Michael E Brown <michael_e_brown@dell.com>
- Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
  - From: Alan Robertson <alanr@unix.sh>
- Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
  - From: "Bill Todd" <billtodd@foo.mv.com>

Prev by Date: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
Next by Date: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
Prev by thread: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
Next by thread: Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread