[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [LinuxFailSafe] Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework
--- James Mello <kingjamm@colltech.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what kind of clustering are you talking about? Are
> you talking specifically about HA, or the LB kind?
>
> -- Cheers
> -- James
This thread is oriented to HA, although the IBM work that is referenced by the
text below was used in HA and in high performance/LB clusters (Beowulf-like,
IBM SP MPP).
>
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, David Brower wrote:
>
> > IMO, IBM and Compaq both Got It Right when they
> > put an generalized pub/sub event system in the middle
> > of their cluster frameworks. I've been pointing this
> > out for a while, but it doesn't seem to have gotten any
> > traction-- neither Tweedie's old proposal or Robertson's
> > here have one AFAICT.
<snip>
> >
> > -dB
> >
> > --
> > Butterflies tell me to say:
> > "The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and do not
> necessarily
> > represent those of Oracle Corporation."
>
Peter
=====
These have been the opinions of:
Peter R. Badovinatz -- (503)578-5530 (TL 775)
wombat@us.ibm.com/tabmowzo@yahoo.com
and in no way should be construed as official opinion of
IBM, Corp.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/