Re: A proposal for a General Clustering Framework

[Carlos Manzanedo <manaha@wanadoo.es>]

do you think HP developers will agree with rpc ? 
ok , they should agree sharing components and may be xml , but i think
that the net load of an HP cluster uses to be hight enough to overload
it with rpc ...
   
> xml-rpc and/or soap is a great idea. I've just been using it in one of my
> projects to connect some C<-->Perl<-->PHP (and possibly VB on windows in
> the future) and it is awesome.
> --
> Michael Brown
> 
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, David Brower wrote:
> 
> > IMO, IBM and Compaq both Got It Right when they
> > put an generalized pub/sub event system in the middle
> > of their cluster frameworks.   I've been pointing this
> > out for a while, but it doesn't seem to have gotten any
> > traction-- neither Tweedie's old proposal or Robertson's
> > here have one AFAICT.
> >
> > FWIW, xml-rpc is a perfectly fine mechanism for such
> > an event system, once you get the subscription mechanism
> > in place.  You probably also want more authentication and
> > authorization than is used on things that assume private
> > networks for cluster traffic.
> >
> > -dB
> >
> > --
> > Butterflies tell me to say:
> > "The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily
> >   represent those of Oracle Corporation."
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Linux HA Web Site:
> >   http://linux-ha.org/
> > Linux HA HOWTO:
> >   http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/ALPHA/linux-ha/High-Availability-HOWTO.html
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
> Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/
> 

Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/