[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cluster question

To: linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: Cluster question
From: Thierry Mallard <thierry.mallard@IDEALX.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:58:56 +0100
In-Reply-To: <3AB9B7C1.E81CFBD7@arrowhead.se>; from josef.hook@arrowhead.se on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 09:28:49AM +0100
References: <3AB9B7C1.E81CFBD7@arrowhead.se>
Sender: owner-linux-cluster@nl.linux.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i

On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 09:28:49AM +0100, Josef Höök wrote:
> Anyone have an idea on which cluster system would be best suited for
> running applications like OpenLDAP and Sendmail..

I think it depends on what part of clustering you mean : 

- high availability (don't need to deal with concurrency)
- load balancing 
- parallelized processing

Since it's my first post on the list, I may be off topic because possibly this
list is dedicated to, say, load-balancing (I don't know ;-)

Best regards,
-- 
Thierry Mallard                    | GnuPG key on pgp.ai.mit.edu
http://IDEALX.com                  | key 0xA3D021CB
http://thierry.mallard.com         | 



Linux-cluster: generic cluster infrastructure for Linux
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-cluster/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cluster question
  - From: Josef Höök <josef.hook@arrowhead.se>

References:
- Cluster question
  - From: Josef Höök <josef.hook@arrowhead.se>
- Cluster question
  - From: Josef Höök <josef.hook@arrowhead.se>

Prev by Date: Cluster question
Next by Date: Re: Cluster question
Prev by thread: Cluster question
Next by thread: Re: Cluster question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread