[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: intel-vt versus amd-v?

To: kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: intel-vt versus amd-v?
From: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:38:44 +0300
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904042034520.5666@localhost.localdomain>
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-id: <kernelnewbies.nl.linux.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ecartis-owner@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Politehnica University of Bucharest
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904042034520.5666@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: kernelnewbies-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx

"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> is one of those virtualization extensions noticeably superior to the
> other?

SVM is a bit superior by providing real mode support. The lack of
real mode emulation in the early verions of KVM was quite an issue for
users of VTx.

-- 
Mircea

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ

Follow-Ups:
- Re: intel-vt versus amd-v?
  - From: Robert P. J. Day

References:
- intel-vt versus amd-v?
  - From: Robert P. J. Day

Prev by Date: intel-vt versus amd-v?
Next by Date: Compile Question
Previous by thread: intel-vt versus amd-v?
Next by thread: Re: intel-vt versus amd-v?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread