[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Time loss after calling netif_rx() in a kernel thread

To: "Lukas Razik" <linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Time loss after calling netif_rx() in a kernel thread
From: "Mulyadi Santosa" <mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:36:56 +0700
Cc: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=UZEivcgB94hXmSaad4gNPhC+hFhz7+UbBNxd2rmQiOg=; b=LXSLF5ZRyxI8MEB7IPSbUBh6PsfGXLBxm5ERF9gHQDzeLxVBSGoOVo6jWUJb/R/dp6 nxsZs6tskG+RA+hquK6cb6+y89x1QEfAA65WpIWZJ4YPh33yjYlHD1bztE2OUUOzEjnz vrDFKF6b/X0gN3gThovUapQ89v2/Xy862ZNCw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=B2FD/2CU9F2pY5uZ+8a2MsBjOLUgA20uo9DHRgVnmOjlvhn0VyN0moHilq58A6RFi0 8NmucXtcx4FCA44xpxLM3tLtZxYZFLYH3KHtz+QCBpeOTSv1uLFsROiQ5Xx7voc4hTdK UmPWG3kq8KgAdLBrylwIhLMhp5Pn6q/4mn8bc=
In-reply-to: <486FCE1F.2000004@razik.name>
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-id: <kernelnewbies.nl.linux.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ecartis-owner@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4868D120.7000802@razik.name> <486955BB.3080804@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de> <f284c33d0807010554j147502eayc4dd032ceeeebf04@mail.gmail.com> <486A8512.7090707@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de> <f284c33d0807020632r4507cbc6l93865ff83f1b201@mail.gmail.com> <486BE246.3080306@razik.name> <f284c33d0807050721x77346851j5692c3d424faa914@mail.gmail.com> <486FCE1F.2000004@razik.name>
Sender: kernelnewbies-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Lukas...

OK so far it proves one thing for me..... the only way to reduce
latency is by experimenting with different bottom halves and see the
result by ourselves :D

regards,

Mulyadi.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ

References:
- Re: Time loss after calling netif_rx() in a kernel thread
  - From: Mulyadi Santosa
- Re: Time loss after calling netif_rx() in a kernel thread
  - From: Lukas Razik
- Re: Time loss after calling netif_rx() in a kernel thread
  - From: Mulyadi Santosa
- Re: Time loss after calling netif_rx() in a kernel thread
  - From: Lukas Razik
- Re: Time loss after calling netif_rx() in a kernel thread
  - From: Mulyadi Santosa
- Re: Time loss after calling netif_rx() in a kernel thread
  - From: Lukas Razik

Prev by Date: Re: [linux-dvb] [PATCH] Remove fdump tool for av7110 firmware
Next by Date: Re: [linux-dvb] [PATCH] Remove fdump tool for av7110 firmware
Previous by thread: Re: Time loss after calling netif_rx() in a kernel thread
Next by thread: Re: IDT/Exception handling understanding - kernel vs userspace control path
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread